Turkey (no. 43422/02) Gülçer and Aslım v. Turkey (no. 19914/03) Violation of Article 6 § 3 (c) in conjunction with Article 6 § 1 (fairness) Gülabi Aslan v.

  Turkey , no.   38740/09, 23 October 2018; Ömer Güner v. Turkey , no.   28338/07, 4   September 2018; Girişen v. Turkey , no. 53567/07, 13   March 2018; Canşad and Others v.

Turkey, 26 May 1975, Decisions and Reports (DR) 2, p. 125, at pp. 135-36; no. 8007/77, Cyprus v. Turkey, 10 July 1978, DR 13, p. 85, at p. 146).

Turkey (no. 63133/15), Adem Tunç v. Turkey (no.   4552/16), Sarıyıldız v. Turkey (no. 4684/16), Öncü v. Turkey (no. 4817/16) and Geçim v. Turkey (no. 5332/16) 39.

Separately he and his wife fled Iran and went to Turkey, the first applicant arriving there on 26 March 1997.

Turkey (no. 36531/02) Mehmet Ali Miçooğulları v. Turkey (no. 75606/01) Taci and Eroğlu v. Turkey (no. 18367/04) In these three cases the applicants rely on Article 1 of Protocol No.

Turkey , The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Françoise Tulkens, President,   Ireneu Cabral Barreto,   Danutė Jočienė,   Dragoljub

Turkey , The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Françoise Tulkens, President ,   Ireneu Cabral Barreto,   Vladimiro Zagrebelsky,  

Turkey, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Françoise Tulkens, President,   Danutė Jočienė,   Dragoljub Popović,   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre

  Turkey (op. cit.).

It also appears that her children have left Germany to live with their grandmother in Turkey.

  Turkey (dec.), no. 18888/02, § 72, ECHR 2006 I).

Turkey (dec.), no.   4860/09, 26 March 2013; Demiroğlu and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no.   56125/10, 4   June 2013; and Yıldız and Yanak v. Turkey (dec.), no.

Turkey (no. 6615/03, §§ 14-17, 27 March 2007) and İsmail Sezer v. Turkey (no. 36807/07, §§ 14-21, 24 March 2015). THE LAW I.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION 11.

Tulkens ,   Mr   K. Hajiyev ,   Mr   D. Spielmann ,   Mrs   R. Jaeger ,   Mr   S.E. Jebens, judges , and Mr S.

Turkey (no. 64741/01) H.E. v. Turkey (no. 30498/96) İ.B. v. Turkey (no.30497/96) Mehmet Hanefi Işık v. Turkey (no. 35064/97) Pütün v.

Since 1984, he has lived permanently in the United Kingdom, returning to Turkey only for visits.

[C]-[S], en qualité de liquidateur judiciaire des sociétés Agripole, Financière Turenne Lafayette, Madrange, Géo, Turenne expertises, La Limougeoise de salaisons, Pâtes fraîches Luison, Paul Prédault,

font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 29 November 2018   SECOND SECTION Application no. 10796/08 Mehmet KESKİN against Turkey