The applicants in this case are Fakir Mukhamad Gulom Mukhamad Karim, who was born on 10 May 1968, his wife Svetlana Aleksandrovna Karim, who was born on 6 July 1979 [1] , and their sons Gleb

The rule should ensure that it is possible to ascertain the facts of the case before that possibility fades away, making a fair examination of the question at issue next to impossible (see Baybora and

should be noted that there is no medical evidence relating to Ms Fatime Akalın, Ms Sibel Aktan (Aksoğan), Ms Şerife Arıöz, Ms Gönül Aslan, Ms Esmahan Ekinci, Ms Zeynep Güngörmez, Ms Başak Otlu, Ms Fadime

appears to be the combination of two of several elements usually found in an Arabic name, these being a first name ( ism , Abbas) and a teknonym or nom de guerre ( kunya, Abulfazl, from the Arabic Abu al-Fadl

  585/2018 of the Athens Court of First Instance, which included more overnight stays as time passed, whereby the estrangement between the applicant and his child would fade.

Türkiye 15/05/2020 Fadime DANIŞMAN 1984 İzmir Turkish Mahir ORAK   24042/20 Satan v. Türkiye 02/06/2020 Hasan SATAN 1992 Şanlıurfa Turkish     24760/20 Özen v.

The rule should ensure that it is possible to ascertain the facts of the case before that possibility fades away, making a fair examination of the question at issue next to impossible (see Kelly v. the

Finally, it should ensure the possibility of ascertaining the facts of the case before the chance to do so fades away, making a fair examination of the question at issue next to impossible (see Kelly v

It was later revealed that CS/1 was a Mr Al-Fadl who had given evidence against the certain of the applicants’ co-defendants during their trial in the United States. 44.

final judgment acquitting the applicant on all charges was re-examined and quashed by granting the prosecutor’s request for leave to appeal out of time against the acquittal decision (see, by contrast, Fadin

  Turkey , no. 24827/05, § 38, 23 April 2013; Fadime and Turan Karabulut v.   Turkey , no. 23872/04, § 43, 27 May 2010; and Bektaş and Özalp v.

    ensure the legal and physical protection of victims, their fami

The rule is intended to ensure that it is possible to ascertain the facts of the case before that possibility fades away, making a fair examination of the question at issue next to impossible (see Pavlenko

Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Päivi Hirvelä, President,   Ineta Ziemele,   George Nicolaou,   Nona Tsotsoria,   Paul Mahoney,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,   Faris

The rule also provides the opportunity to ascertain the facts of the case before memory of them fades away with time (see Abuyeva and Others v. Russia , no. 27065/05, § 175, 2 December 2010). 44.

This is so since over time, memories of witnesses fade or witnesses may become untraceable (as was the case with Z.C.) and the prospects that any effective investigation can be undertaken will increasingly

Finally, it should ensure that the facts of the case are ascertained as promptly as possible, before the chance to do so fades away, making a fair examination of the question at issue next to impossible

J'avais deux chiens, mais en 2010, je ne promenais pas les chiens, c'est sûr, moi je ne fais pas de mécanique et c'est mon frère qui s'occupait du garage » (D3595) ; qu'il a ensuite précisé, au cours de

However, with the passage of time, a retrial will not always be possible as witnesses may disappear, their memories may fade or evidence may be lost.