s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 11 October 2021   SECOND SECTION Application no. 26605/19 Ruhi HALLAÇOĞLU against Turkey

Par un mémoire en défense enregistré le 1er décembre 2021, la commune de Turenne conclut au rejet de la requête.

Turkey (no. 71901/01) The applicant, Osman Akagün, is a Turkish national who was born in 1941 and lives in Şanlıurfa (Turkey).

Turkey judgment of 9   June 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1520, § 67; Selcuk and Asker v. Turkey judgment of 24 April 1998, Reports 1998-II, p.   913, § 97; Kurt v.

Moreover, it was also improbable that the first applicant would be prosecuted in Turkey on the suspicion of having, at the time, exported the drugs from Turkey, which would be regarded as a separate offence

They all left their country of origin and entered Turkey illegally.

:0pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution ResDH(2001)177 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 22 May 2001 in the case of Kisa and others against Turkey

Turkey [GC], no.   36391/02, ECHR   2008; and Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos.   50541/08 and 3 others, 13 September 2016).

0pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution ResDH(2001)176 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 22 May 2001 in the case of Civelek and others against Turkey

lodged on 19 July 2005 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicants are Turkish nationals and live in Ankara, Turkey.

Turkey , no. 28338/07, 4 September 2018; and compare Dominka v. Slovakia , (dec.) no. 14630/12, §§ 28-36, 3   April 2018).

Turkey , they further relied on Article 6   § 1 (right to a fair trial in a reasonable time).   Karapınar v. Turkey (no 49394/99) Taş and Others v.

Turkey , no. 38740/09, 23 October 2018; Ömer Güner v.   Turkey , no.   28338/07, 4 September 2018; Girişen v. Turkey; no.   53567/07, 13   March 2018; Canşad and Others v.

  Turkey, no.   46661/99, §§ 107 and 122-24, 21 September 2006, and Göçmen v.   Turkey , no.

Turkey , no. 38740/09, 23 October 2018; Ömer Güner v.   Turkey , no.   28338/07, 4 September 2018; Girişen v. Turkey , no.   53567/07, 13   March 2018; Canşad and Others v.

Turkey , no. 7851/05, 13   March 2018; İzzet Çelik v. Turkey , no. 15185/05, 23 January 2018; and Bayram Koç v.   Turkey , no. 38907/09, 5 September 2017). 12.

Turkey , no. 13304/03, §§ 39-48, 2 February 2010; Gül and Others v. Turkey , no. 4870/02, §§ 32-45, 8 June 2010; Menteş v.

Turkey , nos. 49197/06 and 4 others, § 44, 22   January 2013; Gülcü v. Turkey , no. 17526/10, §§ 98-102, 19 January 2016; and Fatih Taş v. Turkey (no. 2) , no. 6813/09, § 15, 10 October 2017).

Finally, the Delegate noted that the applicant had left Turkey via Istanbul airport.

Turkey (no. 33746/02) Süer and Others v.