statuer et elle a ainsi violé l'article L. 461-1 du code de la sécurité sociale ; 2) ALORS QUE selon l'annexe 13-7 du code de la santé publique, une « dose efficace » exprimée en mSv (milli-sievert

déférée à la Cour : Jugement du 06 NOVEMBRE 2019 TRIBUNAL DE COMMERCE DE MONTPELLIER N° RG 2019005237 APPELANTE : SCI LE PIGNE [Adresse 2] [Localité 3] Représentée par Me Nathalie SILLERES

entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme B, - les conclusions de Mme Delon, rapporteure publique, - les observations de Me Le Junter, représentant Mme D, et celles de Me Sillères

Il me faut : le numéro SIERT de l'association, et si tu trouves, un numéro d'URSSAF ».

C, et celles de Me Silleres, représentant la commune de Montpellier. Une note en délibéré a été présentée pour M. C le 23 juin 2023. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. Le 24 juin 2021, M.

Par des mémoires en défense, enregistrés le 6 janvier 2025 et le 3 avril 2025, la commune d'Agde, représentée par Me Sillères et par Me Crétin, conclut au rejet de la requête et à ce que soit mise à la

Par un mémoire en défense, enregistré le 28 mars 2022, le département de l'Hérault, représenté par la SCP CGCB et associés, agissant par Me Sillères et Me Rosier, conclut au rejet de la requête et à ce

This [applicant] was seen daily by his solicitor after an initial 24-hour deferral and if he chose to remain silent it was his free choice.

Having been notified of the right not to incriminate himself, the applicant chose to remain silent until he had access to his lawyer, D., on 18 May 2002.

The court found that Mr A. had had a right to remain silent as he could not rule out that the information given could be used against him in criminal proceedings.

At the same time the investigator explained to the applicant her rights to a lawyer and to remain silent.

The Court firstly observes that according to the record of the questioning and the relevant form that was signed by the applicant, she was informed of her rights and in particular the right to remain silent

  If in such a situation, the person concerned had the right to remain silent, the entire tax system would be called in question.

That risk was further underpinned by the fact that some of the accused remained silent when they had been examined by the investigating judge.

It stated that the applicant had been informed of his right to remain silent, and that he had then been interviewed by an investigator in the presence of a lawyer and did not make any allegations of ill-treatment

F, accompanied by his defence lawyer, remained silent. The investigating judge opened an investigation in respect of C, D, E and F in connection with the killing of A. 14.

    The Government concluded that the applicant had waived his right to remain silent or to be assisted by a lawyer, in a clear and unequivocal manner.

    Questioned as suspects on 28 October 2019, Officers T.M. and P.J. chose to remain silent. 24.

  The court then decided not to give him leave to remain silent (Article 153 of the Code of Criminal Procedure) and, as he persisted in his refusal, first fined him 3,000 schillings and then sentenced

N refused to comment on any of his statements and stated that he would remain silent.