AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
6EME SOUS-SECTION JUGEANT SEULE
CETAT:CETATEXT000008235448
21 septembre 2005
21 septembre 2005
Samir A, représenté par son épouse Mme Maryse A ; M. et Mme A demandent au Conseil d'Etat l'annulation pour excès de pouvoir de la décision du 25 novembre 2004, par laquelle la commission de recours contre
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0831DEC003186696
31 août 1999
31 août 1999
A letter to that effect was sent the same day to the Public Prosecutor.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1209DEC005703716
9 décembre 2021
9 décembre 2021
Complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under Article 6 of the Convention.
Source officielleCour d'Appel
6253cd93bd3db21cbdd93b89
1 décembre 2016
1 décembre 2016
Samir Y..., originaire de MARSEILLE et conducteur du véhicule de marque BMW, était trouvé en possession de 740 € en espèces.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-116746
24 janvier 2013
24 janvier 2013
On the same day the applicant made a payment of an unspecified sum of money and the Croatian Pension Fund issued a certificate, which reads as follows: “This is to confirm that the person in obligation
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0709DEC006352300
9 juillet 2002
9 juillet 2002
By a decision of 9 May 1991, which was made enforceable on the same day, the Rome Magistrate upheld the validity of the notice to quit and ordered that the premises be vacated by 31 December 1992.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0703DEC002453505
3 juillet 2006
3 juillet 2006
At the same time the applicant instituted proceedings in the Sambir District Court of Lviv Region against the military unit, claiming compensation for his uniform.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0627DEC006340800
27 juin 2002
27 juin 2002
By a decision of 20 February 1988, which was made enforceable on the same day, the Rome Magistrate upheld the validity of the notice to quit and ordered that the premises be vacated by 31 January 1989.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-145636
20 juin 2014
20 juin 2014
PEKER and others against Turkey lodged on 1 October 2010 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicants, Mrs Rahime Peker, Mr Mehmet Peker, Mrs Mecbure Karabaş, Mr Ramazan Peker, Ms Saime Peker, Mr Abdullah
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0627DEC006284400
27 juin 2002
27 juin 2002
By a decision of 8 June 1989, which was made enforceable on the same day, the Rome Magistrate upheld the validity of the notice to quit and ordered that the premises be vacated by 30 June 1990.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0108DEC006291300
8 janvier 2004
8 janvier 2004
By a decision of 9 October 1987, which was made enforceable on the same day, the Torre del Greco Magistrate upheld the validity of the notice to quit and ordered that the premises be vacated by 31 December
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-193702
16 mai 2019
16 mai 2019
At the same time it informed the applicant of the amount of money collected on his individual fund (PLN 112,000 as contributions and PLN 565,000 as the initial capital).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0627DEC006046400
27 juin 2002
27 juin 2002
By a decision of 3 December 1992, which was made enforceable on the same day, the Rome Magistrate upheld the validity of the notice to quit and ordered that the premises be vacated by 30 May 1995.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202236
11 mars 2020
11 mars 2020
On 2 August 2013 the municipality issued a building permit for the said works, which were executed the same year.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-186614
7 septembre 2018
7 septembre 2018
However, although the domestic court accepted their request for the amendment of the main amount, it refused to do the same for the interest rate, pointing out that interest rates were not subject to amendment
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-178041
27 septembre 2017
27 septembre 2017
If the deprivation was lawful, did that deprivation impose and excessive burden on the applicants (see, mutatis mutandis , Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999 ‑ V)?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179478
24 novembre 2017
24 novembre 2017
On the same day, acting upon the request of the State Attorney’s Office which was never forwarded to the defence, the Pula-Pola County Court seized the real-estates at issue and froze the applicant
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-220891
21 octobre 2022
21 octobre 2022
On the same day, company Rybářství Třeboň a.s. became Rybářství Třeboň Hld. a.s. , the current name of the company in application no. 33175/22.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-68441
23 février 2005
23 février 2005
hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Carnasciali case delivered on 29 January 2004 and transmitted the same
Source officiellecr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2016:CR04478
19 octobre 2016
19 octobre 2016
prévenu était nerveux, lui avait dit qu'il avait fait un testament, avait tout prévu depuis deux mois et laissé des écrits à son service ; qu' elle précisait qu'en la quittant il lui avait déclaré « je sais
Source officiellePage 60 sur 2323