CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 27 septembre 2017
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-178041
- Date
- 27 septembre 2017
- Publication
- 27 septembre 2017
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   Communicated on 27 September 2017   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 66249/16 Zulfiya ALIYEVA against Azerbaijan and 5 other applications (see list appended) SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the applicants’ complaint about non-payment of statutory additional compensation for expropriation of their properties by the Baku City Executive Authority (”the BCEA”) through conclusion of sale contracts with them on the basis of Order No. 243 of the head of the BCEA dated 31 May 2011 entitled “Relocation of housing and commercial premises from within the area bordered by 7 and 9 Agil Guliyev Street, 2   Fathi Khoshginabi Street, 9 Aydin Nasirov Street, 3 and 10 to 12 Elchin and Vusal Hajibabayevs Street in the Sabail District for the expansion of the highway.” The order stated that the residents of the buildings and houses located in the above-mentioned area were to be relocated and given compensation of 1,500 Azerbaijani manats (AZN) per sq. m. of surface area. The additional compensation that the applicants claim to be entitled to consists of the following: ‑     Additional compensation in the amount of 20% of the main compensation, in accordance with Presidential Decree no. 689 of 26   December 2007; and ‑     Additional compensation in the amount of 10% of the main compensation, in accordance with Article 66 of the Law on Expropriation of Lands (except application no. 64650/16). QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.     Have the applicants been deprived of their possessions in the public interest, and in accordance with the conditions provided by law, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention? In particular, were the applicants entitled to statutory additional compensation in the amounts of 20% and 10% (except application no.   64650/16) of the main compensation respectively? Were the applicant’s properties expropriated by the State authorities in compliance with the law? If the deprivation was lawful, did that deprivation impose and excessive burden on the applicants (see, mutatis mutandis , Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999 ‑ V)?   2.     Have the applicants suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of their Convention rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention? In particular, have the applicants been refused to be paid additional compensation, whereas other individuals in the same situation have been paid such compensation? If so, did that difference in treatment pursue a legitimate aim; and did it have a reasonable justification?   APPENDIX   No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Nationality Represented by   66249/16 08/11/2016 Zulfiya ALIYEVA 1971 Baku Azerbaijan Sadig BAGIROV   66271/16 08/11/2016 Nazila MAMMADOVA 1964 Baku Azerbaijan Sadig BAGIROV   75978/16 02/12/2016 Svetlana FEDOROVA 1954 Baku Azerbaijan Sadig BAGIROV   77309/16 07/12/2016 Turan ALIYEV 1989 Baku Azerbaijan Sadig BAGIROV   77691/16 07/12/2016 Guteyis HUSEYNOVA 1973 Baku Azerbaijan Sadig BAGIROV   1038/17 13/12/2016 Tatyana MURATOVA 1944 Baku Azerbaijan Sadig BAGIROV    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 27 septembre 2017
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-178041
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel