Convention;   Having satisfied itself that, within the time-limit set, the respondent state paid the applicant the just satisfaction provided in the judgment (see details in Appendix),   Recalling

convention"),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Capuano case, delivered on 25 June 1987 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers;   Recalling

convention"),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Deumeland case, delivered on 29 May 1986 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers;   Recalling

judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the final judgment transmitted the same day by the Court to the Committee;   Recalling

the European Court of Human Rights in the Atkinson case delivered on 8   April   2003 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Varey case delivered on 21 December 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers on the same date under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Matthies-Lenzen case delivered on 5 February 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling

judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Aggiato case delivered on 29 February 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers on the same date under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling

judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Pawlinkowska case delivered on 8 July 2003 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling

judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Ostrowski case delivered on 28 September 2004 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Kemal Güven case delivered on 22 May 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling

judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Aygördü and others case delivered on 22 May 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling

European Court of Human Rights in the case of Gündüz and others delivered on 14 November 2000 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling

judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Yolcu case delivered on 5 February 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling

xa0; Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Marte and Achberger case delivered on 5 March 1998 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers;   Recalling

the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee once they had become final;   Recalling

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgment of the Court which was transmitted to the Committee once it had become final;   Recalling

in the case of Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov against Ukraine and 389 cases in the Zhovner group transmitted to the Committee for supervision of its execution under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling

and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Recalling