CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 23 février 2005

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s66053943 { text-transform:uppercase } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } Resolution ResDH(2005)13 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 14 November 2000 (Friendly settlement) in the case of Gündüz and others against Turkey   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 23 February 2005 at the 914th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocol No. 11 (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),   Having regard to the final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Gündüz and others delivered on 14 November 2000 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 31249/96) against Turkey, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 26 September 1995 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr Enver Gündüz, Mr Şirin Ağahatun, Mr Hüseyin Avcı, Mr Hanifi Turan, Mr Şahabettin Alp and Ms Menşura Avcı, six Turkish nationals, and that the Court, seised of the case under Article 5, paragraph 2, of Protocol No. 11, declared admissible the applicants' complaints relating to the excessive length of their detention in police custody and to ill-treatment which was allegedly inflicted on them during that detention;   Whereas in its judgment of 14 November 2000 the Court, after having taken formal note of a friendly settlement reached by the government of the respondent state and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlement was based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided unanimously to strike the case out of its list and took note of the parties' undertaking not to request a re-hearing of the case before the Grand Chamber;   Whereas under the above-mentioned friendly settlement it was agreed that the Government of Turkey would pay the applicants the total sum of 190   000 French francs within three months as from the notification of the judgment;   Recalling that Rule 43, paragraph 3, of the Rules of the Court (former Article 44, paragraph 2) provides that the striking out of a case which has been declared admissible shall be effected by means of a judgment which the President shall forward to the Committee of Ministers once it has become final in order to allow it to supervise, in accordance with Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the execution of any undertakings which may have been attached to the discontinuance, friendly settlement or solution of the matter; Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having satisfied itself that on 13 February 2001, within the time-limit agreed to under the terms of the friendly settlement, the government of the respondent state had paid the applicants the sums provided for in the friendly settlement;   Recalling that, as regards the applicants' complaints declared admissible in this case, measures had already been taken to prevent possible violations of the Convention arising from these kinds of complaints, in particular through the amendments of the legislation governing police custody (see Resolution ResDH(2002)110 in the case of Sakık and others);   Declares, after having examined the information supplied by the Government of Turkey, that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case.