CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Pôle 6 - Chambre 2
644229e6d2fa6fd0f8040445
20 avril 2023
Représentée par Me Elodie PUISSANT, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : B0372 Syndicat CONFÉDÉRATION DE L'ARTISANAT ET DES PETITES ENTREPRISES DU BÂTIMENT [Adresse 3] [Localité 12] Représentée par Me Audrey
Page 6 sur 16
2ème Chambre
6684ead4a0de54ff609f7d5e
2 juillet 2024
N° RG 22/01158 - N° Portalis DBVM-V-B7G-LJDL N° Minute : C1 Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à la SCP GUIDETTI BOZZARELLI LE MAT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124DEC002178215
24 janvier 2017
the context of prisoners, the Court has had previous occasion to emphasise that persons in custody are in a vulnerable position and that the authorities are under a duty to protect them (see Paul and Audrey
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506DEC004791699
6 mai 2003
They also complain in respect of the same matters under Article 8 in their capacity as the family and next-of-kin of the deceased.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0309JUD007548512
9 mars 2023
Sokorenko, from the Ministry of Justice; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated in private on 9 February 2023, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: SUBJECT MATTER
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0113JUD001299110
13 janvier 2022
, in principle, be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1211JUD004290618
11 décembre 2025
remainder of the application inadmissible; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated in private on 20 November 2025, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: SUBJECT MATTER
6e chambre
5fdb09d2fdb6a99e3bc7f54b
18 avril 2019
départage de SAINT GERMAIN EN LAYE N° Section : Industrie N° RG : F 15/00268 Copies exécutoires et certifiées conformes délivrées le 19 Avril 2019 à : - Me Emmanuelle BOUSSARD- VERRECCHIA - Me Audrey
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1125JUD003027103
25 novembre 2010
The matter was remitted for fresh consideration. 21.
Pôle 6 - Chambre 9
5fde53ffabd0423050332b96
27 juin 2018
née le [...] à COTE D'IVOIRE représentée par Me Audrey Z..., avocat au barreau de NICE, toque : C 566 COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : En application des dispositions de l'article 945-1 du code de procédure
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0112JUD003614605
12 janvier 2012
In particular, the choice of means for ensuring the positive obligations under Article 2 is in principle a matter that falls within the Contracting State’s margin of appreciation. 34.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0318DEC007225411
18 mars 2014
render the remedy ineffective, it is appropriate to take as the start of the six-month period the date when he first became aware or ought to have become aware of those circumstances (see Paul and Audrey
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1201DEC004550399
1 décembre 2009
The applicant had also contacted a former class-mate of the first applicant who in a statement dated 18 November 1997 confirmed that when at the Red Cross premises in Nicosia in August 1974 she had seen
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1207DEC001918791
7 décembre 1993
Audrey Glover Agent Mr. Michael Baker Q.C.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0721JUD002577409
21 juillet 2015
The Court has reiterated that this positive obligation is not an obligation of result but of means only (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v.
Pôle 5 - Chambre 1
63e49fd35a87f705dec49dda
11 janvier 2023
chambre - RG n° 2018001427 APPELANTES Mme [K] [M] Née le 12 avril 1967 à [Localité 9] (92) De nationalité française Styliste Demeurant [Adresse 1] [Localité 7] Représentée par Me Audrey
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1205DEC005382910
5 décembre 2017
The matter was brought before the Forensic Medicine Institute, which informed the assize court that blood samples taken after death would not be indicative of the glucose levels preceding death. 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0618DEC007445213
18 juin 2019
The Government thus considered that the matter had been resolved within the meaning of Article 37 of the Convention. 2. The applicants 20.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0209REP001658090
9 février 1993
Audrey Glover of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0507JUD004388110
7 mai 2020
41720/13, § 134, 25 June 2019; L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom , no. 23413/94, p. 1403, § 36; and Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom , no. 46477/99, § 54, ECHR