The prosecuting authorities discontinued the proceedings because there had been no defamation, fraud or unlawful use of the applicant’s personal data,   and the applicant could not rely on the Article

The applicant, who did not have “rights of custody” within the meaning of the Hague Convention, could not rely on the protection which it provided.

In particular, did the applicant invoke before the Constitutional Court, at least in substance, the rights under Articles 8 of the Convention on which he now wishes to rely before the Court (see, for the

It appears that the domestic courts did not rely on those changes in their decisions. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

  Government’s preliminary objection (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Objection that applicant had omitted to rely on Law no. 466 of 7 May 1964 and had not instituted proceedings in Turkish courts

  1 applicable without it being necessary to rely solely on link between entitlement to emergency assistance and obligation to pay "taxes or other contributions" - Article   14 therefore applicable

In particular, could they legitimately rely on any restitution effect of the Constitutional Court’s judgment of 4 June 1998, and were they considered the owners of the properties at issue prior to the

The applicants rely on Article 3 of the Convention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

In particular, did the applicant invoke before the national authorities, at least in substance, the right to a reasoned judgment on which he now wishes to rely before the Court?   2.

It did not rely on the recordings. Law : Article 8 – It was not in dispute that the police had suggested to S. that she record her conversations with the applicant.

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête enregistrée le 18 juillet 2022, Mme D B, épouse A, représentée par Me Remy-Messeca, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 2 mai 2022 par lequel

par Maître Delphine THIERY loco Maître Yves MOUNIER, avocats au barreau de BORDEAUX, INTIMÉE : Madame [K] [T], demeurant [Adresse 1], Représentée par Maître Aurélie JOURNAUD, SCP CABINET REMY

chambre, Josiane BIGOT, conseiller, assesseur, Marie-Emmanuelle BADINAND, conseiller, assesseur, En présence de : Rachel FINITZER, élève avocate Greffier présent aux débats et au prononcé : Claudine REMY

né le 18 Novembre 1962 à SAINT-REMY (71100) ... 01310 SAINT-MARTIN-LE-CHATEL représenté par Me Annick DE FOURCROY, avoué à la Cour assisté de la SELARL BLOISE, avocats au barreau de BOURG-EN-BRESSE

.-33620 CEZAC, représentée par Maître REMY substituant Maître Solène ROQUAIN-BARDET, avocat au barreau de BORDEAUX, INTIMÉE : FONDS DE GARANTIE DES VICTIMES DES ACTES DE TERRORISME ET D'AUTRES

FERRARI, les observations de la société civile professionnelle WAQUET, FARGE et HAZAN, avocat en la Cour, et les conclusions de M. l'avocat général AMIEL ; Statuant sur le pourvoi formé par : - REMY

rapport de Mme le conseiller BAILLOT, les observations de Me FOUSSARD, avocat en la Cour, et les conclusions de M. l'avocat général ROBERT ; Statuant sur le pourvoi formé par : - ISCACHE alias REMY

    In accepting that appeal, did the same court rely on an argument (that the V.’s mayoralty had no procedural standing in the case) of which the parties were not informed and which had not

Furthermore, they rely on Articles 8 and 14 of the Convention and Article 2 of the Protocol   no. 1 to argue that their rights to education and to privacy were violated on account of their inability

In particular, did the applicant invoke before the Court of Cassation, at least in substance, the rights under Article 6 §   1 on which he now wishes to rely before the Court?   2.