Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-228821
9 octobre 2023
9 octobre 2023
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, specifically to his right to honour and reputation, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention ( Sanchez
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229303
6 novembre 2023
6 novembre 2023
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life or her private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196449
9 septembre 2019
9 septembre 2019
The applicant complains that he has been subjected to ill-treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention and that the authorities have failed to conduct an effective investigation into those allegations
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187176
26 septembre 2018
26 septembre 2018
of the Governorship of Izmir dated 23 January 2007 and the Ministry of Interior’s decision to initiate an investigation against those responsible, was the impugned area allocated to a third party, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-212145
9 septembre 2021
9 septembre 2021
non-enforcement of the court ruling of 1 July 2019 (as amended by the appellate court on 19 November 2019), has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for private and family life, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242181
3 février 2025
3 février 2025
EUR) on the applicant company for failing to respect the principle of due accuracy and impartiality ( pienācīgas precizitātes un neitralitātes princips) by using the term “deportation” in a manner contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242669
14 mars 2025
14 mars 2025
Has the applicant suffered discrimination contrary to Article 14 of the Convention, read in conjunction with Articles 3, 5, 6, 8 or 13 of the Convention, compared to other psychiatric patients whose complaints
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-226290
10 juillet 2023
10 juillet 2023
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings owing to the domestic courts’ failure to deliver a reasoned judgment in respect of the applicant, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-228232
18 septembre 2023
18 septembre 2023
dismissal of the applicants’ constitutional complaints due to allegedly unforeseeable application of new four-month time-limit, depriving the applicants of right of access to the Constitutional Court, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218106
1 juin 2022
1 juin 2022
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218149
1 juin 2022
1 juin 2022
The applicant complains under Article 8 of the Convention that there has been an unlawful interference with his right to privacy because the secret surveillance orders were issued contrary to the requirements
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223319
31 janvier 2023
31 janvier 2023
Has the applicant suffered gender-based discrimination contrary to Article 14 of the Convention, read in conjunction with either Article 3 or Article 8 of the Convention, during the conduct
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-249950
2 avril 2026
2 avril 2026
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ freedom to leave the territory of the respondent State, contrary to Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 (see Khlyustov v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-186606
4 septembre 2018
4 septembre 2018
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10543
22 septembre 1994
22 septembre 1994
Personal impartiality of each of the members of the Board had to be presumed until there was proof to the contrary - danger of paralysis of whole disciplinary system if challenged members were excluded
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-184385
7 juin 2018
7 juin 2018
Has the applicant suffered discrimination based on her residence, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 to the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4372
4 mai 2004
4 mai 2004
Despite the contrary view of two psychiatrists, the MHRT concluded that the applicant was to be conditionally discharged on condition that she reside at the home of her parents and continue to take medication
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-200427
16 décembre 2019
16 décembre 2019
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see, a fortiori, Császy v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-227685
29 août 2023
29 août 2023
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her right to respect for her private life on the ground of her sex, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196075
29 août 2019
29 août 2019
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention?
Source officiellePage 57 sur 1005