CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 16 décembre 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s8D8D6D59 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:center; page-break-after:avoid } .s64CDEC6 { width:108.1%; border-collapse:collapse } .sD8F5C0B { width:6.96%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s817AE20C { width:20.34%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s48CF9875 { width:31.16%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s274C8C3F { width:41.54%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sCDFAFC34 { width:6.96%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sADA854A5 { width:20.34%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF5D8EC33 { width:31.16%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7D7B3F53 { width:41.54%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Communicated on 16 December 2019   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 49059/18 Mártonné PATAI and Elizabet FARAGÓ against Hungary lodged on 10 October 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the prison authorities’ refusal, on 10 April 2018, to allow a suspension of the terminally ill Mr Csurár’s incarceration so that his family members (Ms Patai, his common-law wife and Ms   Faragó, their daughter) could spend his last days with him. He died on 17   April 2018. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention (see, a fortiori, Császy v.   Hungary , no. 14447/11, 21 October 2014)?   List of Applicants   No. Applicant’s Name Birth date Place of residence 1 Mártonné PATAI 18/07/1966 Makó 2 Elizabet FARAGÓ 19/10/1995 Makó 3 Pál CSURÁR 12/05/1963 Deceased: 17/04/2018 In regard to this applicant, the application has been declared incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention (Art 35 § 3)