CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

20 088 résultats pour « Conerardy »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-197184

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2019

2 octobre 2019

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, in the light of the proceeding for the return of the children

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-223333

Admin. suprême

1 février 2023

1 février 2023

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention (see, inter alia , Kılıçdaroğlu v.   Turkey , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-198534

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2019

24 octobre 2019

    Has there been a breach of the applicant’s rights to respect for his private and family life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-238705

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2024

29 novembre 2024

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention on account of the refusal of the domestic authorities

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4078

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2004

14 décembre 2004

The Supreme Court upheld the judgment, finding that the applicant had not proved his registration had been contrary to the then applicable rules.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-216015

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2022

31 janvier 2022

On 27 May 2013 a court sentenced the applicant to a fine of about 39   euros for holding a public event contrary to the court decision of 17 May 2013.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208008

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2021

18 janvier 2021

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Have the applicants suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of their Convention rights contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 8 of the Convention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6558

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 1999

6 juillet 1999

State prosecution service deprived him of access to the Constitutional Court and maintains that the need for authorisation from the State prosecution service to initiate such appeal proceedings is contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-193841

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2019

9 avril 2019

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-209119

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2021

9 mars 2021

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant suffered discrimination on account of her sex, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article   8 and/or to Article 1 of Protocol

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192139

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2019

6 mars 2019

  QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of expression, in particular their right to impart information and ideas, contrary to Article   10 of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9056

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 1996

17 décembre 1996

Conclusion with regard to risks of treatment contrary to Article 3: not invalidated by applicant's criminal conviction or current lack of State authority in Somalia.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5008

Admin. suprême

13 février 2003

13 février 2003

Inadmissible : Where an applicant called in question a provision of legislation or a regulation as being contrary, as such, to the Convention, and the right invoked was among those guaranteed by the Latvian

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-189560

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2018

18 décembre 2018

In view of all the circumstances, has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention? 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-230909

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2024

8 janvier 2024

      QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention (see, in particular, Strand

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-194905

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2019

5 juillet 2019

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private and family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6254

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2001

22 novembre 2001

Section III] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Imposition of fine on ophthalmologist by professional disciplinary body following publication of an article considered as an advertisement contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9448

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 1995

22 novembre 1995

safeguards against arbitrary prosecution, conviction and punishment – progressive development of criminal law through judicial interpretation, elucidation, and adaptation to changing circumstances not contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9450

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 1995

22 novembre 1995

safeguards against arbitrary prosecution, conviction and punishment – progressive development of criminal law through judicial interpretation, elucidation, and adaptation to changing circumstances not contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-197188

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2019

2 octobre 2019

    If so, has there been a violation of the applicant company’s right to freedom of expression, in particular its right to impart information and ideas, contrary to Article   10 of the

Source officielle

Page 56 sur 1005

← PrécédentSuivant →