A prisoner was guilty of an offence against discipline if he committed an assault (Rule 47(1) of the Prison Rules).

rendu l'arrêt suivant : Vu les articles L. 131-2 et L. 131-3 du code de l'organisation judiciaire ; Ordonne le renvoi devant une chambre mixte du pourvoi n° M 04-10.422 formé par la SCI Groupe Guiry

On appeal, the appeal court found the officer guilty of negligent breach of his official duties as he should have temporarily confiscated the gun, but not guilty of grossly negligent homicide, as he had

third parties, the domestic courts had adopted judgments which unambiguously stated that she had committed criminal offences as part of an organised group, despite the fact that she had not been found guilty

After the Administrative Court quashed the Customs Authority’s decision (in which the applicant was found guilty of the charges raised against it) on 14   January 2013 and discontinued the proceeding

Upon appeal, the competent court annulled the pre-trial detention order, finding that there was no serious evidence of guilt. The applicant was released on 4 July 2017.

The applicant, who was a lieutenant colonel and the executive officer of the battleship TCG Turgutreis, was found guilty, under Article 137 of the Military Criminal Code, of causing significant damage

However, the applicant was unable to recover the funds since, in the meantime, as a result of a judgment of 9   May 2008 confirming a first-instance judgment, the applicant’s father was found guilty

Ukraine lodged on 4 August 2017 communicated on 30 April 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns administrative-offence proceedings against the applicant, as a result of which he was found guilty

A... représentée par Me Guillier, demande au tribunal : 1°) d’annuler la décision implicite du 9 mai 2025 par laquelle le préfet a refusé de lui délivrer un titre de séjour ; 2°) d’enjoindre au

A B, représenté par Me Guillier, demande au juge des référés, sur le fondement de l'article L. 521-3 du code de justice administrative : 1°) d'enjoindre au préfet de police de lui fixer un rendez-vous

grande instance de Paris, en date du 2 décembre 1983, en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 21 juin 1990 par la cour d'appel de Paris (2e chambre B), au profit : 18/ de la société civile professionnelle Guili

As a result, the Criminal Court of General Jurisdiction found the officers guilty of causing bodily injury and sentenced them to one year and three months’ imprisonment.

Relying on Article 6 § 2 the applicant complained that this statement, made before he had been proved guilty with final effect, could have influenced the outcome of the appeal proceedings, it had prejudged

On 8 December 1987 the Regional Court convicted the applicant of tax fraud and sentenced him to 2 years' imprisonment and a fine of 20,000 Dutch Guilders.

Kononov is guilty of the offence under section 68-3 of the Criminal Code ...

    In addition, V.K. was found guilty of organising an act of abuse of office (five episodes).

For that reason, the applicant maintained that E.S.G and R.V.P. had arrived at the hearing with preconceived ideas as to his guilt.

    Lastly, the Court reiterates that a judicial decision may reflect the opinion that the applicant is guilty even in the absence of any formal finding of guilt; it suffices that there is some