légal à compter du 6 Mars 1997 sur la somme de 45.780,84 francs, et à compter du 4 Avril 1997 sur le solde, DIT que les intérêts sur cette somme se capitaliseront à la date du 20 Octobre 1998, et formeront

ce domicilié au siège social 36, rue des Poncées 88200 ST ETIENNE LES REMIREMONT Représentée par Maître Franck KLEIN (Avocat au Barreau d'EPINAL) INTIMÉ : Monsieur Thierry Y... 44 Le Château 70220 FOUGEROLLES

VENDOME 24 ayant son siège social GASTE OU QUARTIER GASTE 26380 PEYRINS représentées par la SCP HARDOUIN, avoué à la Cour assistées de Me Anick FOUGEROUX, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : D 630

The judge found inter alia that the prosecution had taken no procedural action as to the charge of official forgery against the applicant, which had not been mentioned in the bill of indictment.

On an unspecified date the public prosecutor's office ordered the applicant to be questioned and informed her that she and the other persons charged were suspected of committing extortion, fraud and forgery

    The search was carried out in the context of an investigation into the alleged forgery of works of art.

    Insofar as the offence of forgery committed by State officials is concerned, a number of officers were found criminally responsible for forging search records (see paragraph 16 above).

She was also charged with forgery for submitting a falsified international death certificate of I.Š. when seeking to have his death entered into the public register. 35.

According to the prosecutor, those actions raised suspicions of forgery by a public official. However, no criminal proceedings were initiated as V. had since died. 7.

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Marik-Descoings, -les observations de Me Forero Villamil, avocat commis d'office, représentant M.

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Marik-Descoings, - les observations de Me Forero Villamil, avocat commis d'office, représentant M.

Hémery ; - les observations de Me Forrero Villamil, avocat commis d’office, représentant M. B..., Le préfet de police n’était ni présent, ni représenté. Considérant ce qui suit : M.

  The applicant was accused of tax evasion in six cases, fraud in 47 cases, forgery in forty cases, all committed between 1969 and 1973 together with the other co-accused.

    On 8 September 2000 the Wrocław District Court ( Sąd Rejonowy ) detained the applicant on remand on suspicion of having committed theft and forgery and of leadership of an organised criminal

        In 1984 the applicant was convicted in Sweden on several counts of document forgery and sentenced to one year's imprisonment.

( Urkundenfälschung ), forgery of protected documents (Fälschung besonders geschützter Urkunden) and of having given false evidence (falsche Beweisaussage) .

In addition to the original charges, the applicant was further charged under Articles 179.3.2 (high-level embezzlement) and 313 (forgery by an official) of the Criminal Code.

    In April 1997 the applicant instituted criminal proceedings against Mr   V.S., accusing him of fraud and forgery.

    On 8 August 1991 Mr Kudła was charged with fraud and forgery and detained on remand. During his detention, he suffered from chronic depression and twice tried to commit suicide.