Merits 1.     Article 5 § 3 complaint (a)     The parties’ submissions 43.

    Merits 1.     The parties’ submissions 77.

The Court heard addresses by Mr Weitzel, Mr Weh and Mr Cede.   AS TO THE FACTS   I.    CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE   8.

There are so many such stories, identical in substance, that you can hardly dismiss them merely as lies any more.

    The Court heard addresses by Mrs Lazareska Gerovska and Mrs Post and their answers to questions put by the judges. THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 8.

    The applicant and the Government each filed a memorial on the merits. 10.

L'affaire oppose : PARTIES EN CAUSE : APPELANTES Madame [U] [J] épouse [N] Gérante de la SARL AIRAL née le 06 Août 1981 à [Localité 5] - MAROC, demeurant [Adresse 1] Représentée par Me

Par lettre du 27 juin 1996, le requérant fut informé, à la suite de ses lettres adressées au Parlement et au ministère de la Justice, que le parquet général avait réexaminé le dossier pénal ouvert à la

avocat postulant, et assisté de Maître Pierre RAVAUT de la SELARL BIROT-RAVAUT ET ASSOCIES, avocat plaidant, au barreau de BORDEAUX, INTIMÉS : Madame Marie Carmen X..., née le 14 Décembre 1933 à MELILLA

  4 (a)   Applicability – The Court was called upon for the first time to address the issue of the applicability of Article   4 of Protocol No.

the essential issues which were submitted to its jurisdiction and did not merely endorse without further ado the findings reached by a lower court (see Helle v.

The court considered that the applicant partnership, in its submissions before the first instance court, had merely depicted an abstract risk of detriment to Z. AG.

The expert also noted that since August 2012 the applicant’s treatment had been merely symptomatic and the applicant’s drug regimen had been limited to painkillers.

Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time. THE FACTS 4.

It was true that section   93-3 did not address the question of the time at which the producer was supposed to have had knowledge of the unlawful remarks, leaving the relevant domestic courts to decide

However, on 18   October   2021 the mail was returned with an indication that the addressee had not been found at the address given.

The Chamber of Notaries invited the applicant to address the National Land Service with regard to the privatisation of the land. 15.

Moreover, postal service would be invalid if it transpired that the defendant’s address had been incorrect.

He was informed by persons living at that address that she had sold that apartment. 7.