Italy (no. 3) - 126/05 Judgment 18.1.2011 [Section II] Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Vote Ban on prisoner voting imposed automatically as a result of sentence: violation [This case was referred to the Grand

#Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas contra Josef Vosding Schlacht-, Kühl- und Zerlegebetrieb GmbH & Co. (C-278/07), Vion Trading GmbH (C-279/07) y Ze Fu Fleischhandel GmbH (C-280/07).

veuve [Y] venant aux droits de son mari Mr [W] [Y] né le 02/07/1973, décédé le 14/10/2019 - née le 09 Novembre 1975 à [Localité 4] de nationalité Française [Adresse 2] Représentant : Me Isabelle VOLKRINGER

As a convicted prisoner, he is barred by law from voting in parliamentary or local elections. Some 48,000 other prisoners are similarly affected.

Russia - 11157/04 and 15162/05 Judgment 4.7.2013 [Section I] Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Vote Automatic and indiscriminate ban on convicted prisoners’ voting rights: violation   Facts – Both applicants

Dès lors, la mesure en litige, édictée à titre préventif dans un but de protection des mineurs pratiquant la voltige équestre, a le caractère d'une mesure de suspension temporaire d'activités.

  As a result, the applicants could not exercise their voting rights in the elections of 16   September 2007.

Vu 1°), sous le n° 162136, la requête enregistrée le 5 octobre 1994 au secrétariat du Contentieux du Conseil d'Etat, présentée par le CENTRE DE PERFECTIONNEMENT ET DE VOLTIGE AERIENNE dont le siège est

FIDES. prise en la personne de Me [C] [J], en sa qualité de liquidateur de la SARL AMBULANCES DE NUIT, Ayant son siège social [Adresse 2] [Localité 4] Représentée par Me Marc VOLFINGER, avocat au

Article 6 § 2: Although there was no new assessment of guilt (unlike in the case of Sekanina, judgment of 25 August 1993), the Court was not convinced that the voicing of suspicion is acceptable if those

    General provisions on voting in parliamentary elections 7.

The applicant was therefore prevented from voting in legislative elections in April 2006.

Under the Scottish Independence Referendum Franchise Act, convicted prisoners in detention were prohibited from voting.

4,500 Russian roubles [1] because the actions of two applicants (Application nos. 49351/18 and 50054/18) were classified as impediment to the work of an electoral committee and/or as impediment to the voting

  As a convicted prisoner, Mr Hirst was barred by section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 from voting in parliamentary or local elections.

By a decision of 14 March 2011 the TEC dismissed the applicant’s complaint, stating that section 5 of the Kaliningrad Regional Duma Elections Act vested active voting rights in Russian nationals over the

The Kúria upheld the NEC’s finding regarding the infringement of the principle of the exercise of rights in accordance with their purpose, but dismissed its conclusions regarding the voting secrecy and

The voting instead of the member of the Seimas [L.K], by using his [parliamentary identity card] did not have any influence upon the voting results, as the decisions of the Seimas were passed by a great

The applications concern the decision of the Speaker of Parliament to reduce the monthly renumeration of the applicants, members of Parliament, for their conduct during the parliamentary debate and voting