CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

205 résultats pour « Nadia HADJ CHAIB »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0529JUD006440609

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2018

29 mai 2018

According to the applicants, however, no disturbances had taken place at the cemetery until after the governor had taken his decision and the bodies had been confiscated.

Page 5 sur 11

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3187520-3560858

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2010

8 juillet 2010

In a Chamber judgment of 17   September 2009, the Court found that the safeguards against political control of TRM had been inadequate and concluded that there had been a violation of Article  

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 5 - Chambre 5

615e0cdec25a97f0381f4b19

Appel

30 octobre 2014

30 octobre 2014

GLOBAL LOGISTICS' ayant son siège social [Adresse 8] [Localité 3] - ETAT UNIS D'AMERIQUE prise en la personne de ses représentants légaux domiciliés en cette qualité audit siège Représentée par Me Nadia

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0909JUD001373112

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 2021

9 septembre 2021

In particular, she argued that on 27 February 2009 she had fallen and suffered severe injuries because the road had not been constructed in accordance with the construction rules by the respondents. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1024JUD002250093

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 1996

24 octobre 1996

   Mr and Mrs Guillot stated that they had been disappointed not to be able to give their daughter the name they had chosen after careful consideration and to which they were attached.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0401DEC000222810

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2014

1 avril 2014

When questioned by the trial court on 5 December 2008, O.T. added that he had seen and heard how certain police officers had dropped a gun on the roof of the garage after the body of the young man had

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0408JUD004212498

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2004

8 avril 2004

    The applicants complained that the additional compensation for expropriation, which they had obtained from the authorities only after two years and ten months of court proceedings, had fallen

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0205JUD005156499

Admin. suprême

5 février 2002

5 février 2002

Indeed, in November 1998 Mr Čonka had been so seriously injured in an assault that he had had to be hospitalised. The police had been called but had refused to intervene.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0321DEC003279796

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2000

21 mars 2000

  Because of the pressure he had been put under, he had reported the matter to the police in Norway and had sought police protection.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0601JUD004492598

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2004

1 juin 2004

The court noted that in the judgment of 16 December 1993 it had found that the property had been taken away from a private company of which the applicants’ predecessors had been members and which had been

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0130JUD005252912

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2018

30 janvier 2018

    On 7 June 2010 the President of the Supreme Court notified them that she had been informed by the High Court President that the case file had been “at the Court of Appeal in order for it

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-140163

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2013

18 décembre 2013

The counter-demonstrators claimed that nobody had the right to hold a Gay Pride Parade and to promote “perversion”, as it was against moral values.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0704JUD001115704

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2013

4 juillet 2013

They thus argued that his application had been lodged out of time, given that the Court had received it on 23 June 2004.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1025JUD004342905

Admin. suprême

25 octobre 2007

25 octobre 2007

However, they maintained that she had been afforded appropriate redress at the national level. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929DEC002593306

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2009

29 septembre 2009

COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the civil proceedings had been excessively long.

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 4 - Chambre 3

653b5990502b828318c4e53b

Appel

26 octobre 2023

26 octobre 2023

V-B7F-CDWZQ Décision déférée à la Cour : Jugement du 17 Mars 2021-Tribunal de proximité d'AUBERVILLIERS APPELANTE Madame [W] [Y] épouse [S] [Adresse 1] [Localité 5] Représentée par Me Hada

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0211DEC000052618

Admin. suprême

11 février 2020

11 février 2020

    In a decision of 18 December 2015, once the investigation had been completed, the Investigatory Chamber of the FIFA Ethics Committee ruled that the applicant had breached Articles  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244207

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2025

19 juin 2025

is to be noted that the issue of jurisdiction over the area where the incidents giving rise to the complaints allegedly took place is currently under consideration and will be decided by the Grand Chamber

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0120JUD001481104

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2011

20 janvier 2011

had been unlawful and that he had not had effective remedies in respect of those complaints. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0215DEC000822904

Admin. suprême

15 février 2011

15 février 2011

had since 1976 and 1984.

Source officielle