The applicant further claimed that during the hearing on his objection to the disciplinary sanction, the enforcement judge refused to hear the witnesses he had requested to be examined.

Second World War: inadmissible   During the Second World War the applicant was arrested and deported, with the assistance of the French State, under the Vichy laws enacted between 1940 and 1944.

Law – Article 3: The Court could not establish beyond reasonable doubt that the injuries to the applicant’s back, stomach and legs had been inflicted by the police officers during the transfer.

During the revision trial, the new witnesses declared that the applicant had not participated in the crime, while I.A., refused to testify, invoking, as a co-defendant, his right to silence.

In particular, has there been a breach of Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention, as a result of the lack of legal assistance available to the applicant during the preliminary investigation (see Salduz v.

During the trial the applicant was represented by state-appointed counsel G.

During the period from 24 January to 8 March 2008 he underwent inpatient medical treatment for a closed femoral neck fracture supposedly sustained in late December 2007.

In particular, the applicant had been the President of a public limited liability company during the period from 1982 to 1999. She then left the company which continued to exist.

The applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention during transport were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”).

a prisoner: Article 6 applicable Access to court Dismissal of appeal on the ground that the contested measure had expired: violation Facts: The applicant was placed under a special detention regime during

She subsequently requested that the President of the Moscow City Court, Mrs Yegorova, be charged with a disciplinary offence for having allegedly exercised unlawful pressure on the applicant during the

COMPLAINTS The applicant complains, under Article 3 of the Convention, of his ill-treatment during the arrest and police custody and of the lack of an effective investigation in that respect.

the first year, 50% during the second year, 55% during the third year, and 65% during the fourth year, and assuming that during the first six months of the first year and during the first six months of

his detention during each of the two periods which are described above. 10.

#Recurso de decisão do Tribunal Geral — Dumping — Regulamento de Execução (UE) n.o 501/2013 — Importações de bicicletas da Indonésia, da Malásia, do Sri Lanca e da Tunísia — Extensão a estas importações

#Odvolanie – Obchodná politika – Dumping – Dovozy glyfosátu s pôvodom v Číne – Nariadenie (ES) č. 384/96 – Článok 2 ods. 7 písm. b) a c) – Štatút podniku pôsobiaceho v trhovom hospodárstve – Pojem ‚podstatný

#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Brazil, Iran, Russia, Serbia and Ukraine – Termination of the proceedings against imports

#Fælles handelspolitik - beskyttelse mod dumping - antidumpingtold - hæmatit råjern med oprindelse i Rusland - beslutning nr. 67/94/EKSF - fastsættelse af toldværdi med henblik på anvendelsen af en variabel