CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 4 décembre 2013
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-139857
- Date
- 4 décembre 2013
- Publication
- 4 décembre 2013
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulAnalyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s72EB7DC5 { margin-top:18pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s2D57E2E { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; text-transform:uppercase } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sA8776625 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase }       FIRST SECTION Application no. 45599/13 H.P. against Croatia lodged on 3 July 2013 STATEMENT OF FACTS   The applicant is a Croatian national, who was born in 1981 and lives in Zagreb. The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. The applicant, who worked as a police inspector in the Zagreb Police Department ( Policijska uprava Zagrebačka ), was invited to a meeting with a senior police officer on 26 March 2013. According to the applicant, while he was waiting for the meeting, two police officers approached him and forced him into a room. He was then threatened and ill-treated in order to make him confess that he had had contacts with prostitutes. As a result of the ill-treatment he sustained injuries to his chest, left arm and shoulder. In the period between April and June 2013 the applicant complained to the Minister of the Interior ( Ministarstvo uutarnjih poslova ), a parliamentary board for individual complaints, the Zagreb Police Department, the Ministry of Public Administration ( Ministarstvo uprave ) and the Zagreb Municipal State Attorney’s Office ( Općinsko državno odvjetništvo u Zagrebu ) that he was ill-treated during the arrest. In the meantime, on 10 May 2013 the Office for the Suppression of Corruption and Organised Crime ( Ured za suzbijanje korupcije i organiziranog kriminaliteta ) informed the applicant that a criminal complaint against him had been rejected. On 16 May 2013 the Ministry of the Interior informed the applicant that his complaints would be examined. To date no investigative measures have been taken. COMPLAINTS The applicant complains, under Article 3 of the Convention, of his ill-treatment during the arrest and police custody and of the lack of an effective investigation in that respect. He also cites Articles 5 and 14 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 12.   QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Was the applicant subjected to ill-treatment during his arrest, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention?   2.     Having regard to the procedural protection from ill-treatment (see paragraph 131 of Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, ECHR 2000-IV), was the investigation into the present case by the domestic authorities in breach of Article 3 of the Convention?   The Government are requested to submit two copies of the relevant documents concerning the applicant’s arrest, his medical treatment and any investigation taken in that respect.      Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 4 décembre 2013
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-139857
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel