After their divorce in 2020, the parents shared parental responsibility and agreed that the custody of the child (born 2009) would be awarded to the mother who would enable the applicant to see the child

D..., épouse A..., la SARL " Hôtel du Lion d'Or " et la SCI " Hôtel du Lion d'Or " ont demandé au tribunal administratif de Nîmes, d'une part, de condamner la commune de Saint-Chély-d'Apcher à leur verser

The applicant argued that her elder child had been diagnosed with a severe form of autism after having been vaccinated with the same vaccine and that therefore she had asked that immunology tests be carried

Although the applicant had not established any family relationship with the child this was because he had been prevented from taking any steps to assume responsibility for him against the legal parents

It held that Article 157 § 1 of the Criminal Code criminalised the buying and selling of a child.

In 2005 the mother, who was living with her husband and son in the United States, travelled to Switzerland with the child and decided to stay there permanently.

becomes an heir of the adoptive parent(s). (3)     If the adopted child is a minor, he/she takes the adoptive parent(s)’ last name.

He argued that the mother tried to alienate the child from him and she actually failed to fulfil her parental duties.

He requested the Gdańsk District Court to appoint a guardian to represent the child for the purposes of the paternity proceedings.

  submitted to the file an “intervention report” setting out a brief psychological evaluation of the child, issued on 11 April 2017 by the Child Protection Authority.

According to section 25 of the Child Welfare Act and section 9 of the Child Welfare Decree, the Social Welfare Board or the director of a children’s home may restrict the right of access of a child in

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 10 février 2026, la société SARL Boat and Chill demande au tribunal d’annuler la décision du 3 février 2026 par laquelle la direction régionale

Faaa et actuellement à Bora-Bora, Iles Sous le Vent (Polynésie française), en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 21 avril 1994 par la cour d'appel de Papeete (chambre sociale), au profit de la société Lane Chile

  Chief doctor G.B. at the Child Psychiatric Ward was heard as a witness.

to such a situation or risk to the child as mentioned in Section 4-12. 15.

    Following the family’s stay at the parent-child centre, two further notices of concern – from the parent-child centre and from a child health centre, respectively – were received by the child

In the ordinary course the interests of parent and child are congruent. This is not so where a parent wilfully harms his child.

  P   170/93 and concerned the applicant’s rights of   contact with his child and his request for custody of the child.

Accordingly, the fear for life and health of the child had been justified.