CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

30 465 résultats pour « Beccari »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

6EME ET 4EME SOUS-SECTIONS REUNIES

CETAT:CETATEXT000008198051

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2003

28 mai 2003

sourde, la bécassine des marais, la barge à queue noire, la barge rousse, le courlis courlieu, le courlis cendré et les chevaliers arlequin, gambette, aboyeur et combattant et au deuxième samedi d'août

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113DEC000964906

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2008

13 novembre 2008

This judgment became binding on 14 May 1997 but has not been enforced. In 1997 Saturn was declared bankrupt and liquidated. In 2005 Dorotdel was subjected to insolvency proceedings. B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-155549

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2015

29 mai 2015

Eingetragene Partnerschaft ‑ Gesetz ) did not correspond to their idea of an institutionalised partnership as it was in many ways lighter ( lockerer ) than a traditional civil marriage, and because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1213JUD003382004

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2007

13 décembre 2007

    From 11 May to 31 October 2001 no hearings were scheduled, because the case was being transferred to another judge. 21.

Source officielle
CA

Chambre Sociale

6789fa450c7dc206c9eb7e39

Appel

14 janvier 2025

14 janvier 2025

BHR PISCINE sise [Adresse 2] représentée par Me Sarah BECHARI, avocat au barreau de BESANCON ET : INTIMEES Madame [V] [B], demeurant [Adresse 3] représentée par Me Jean-Philippe SCHMITT

Source officielle
CA

TARIFICATION

653ca5f483c9498318209c1b

Appel

27 octobre 2023

27 octobre 2023

GREFFIER LORS DES DÉBATS : Mme Camille BECART PRONONCÉ : Le 27 Octobre 2023, l'arrêt a été rendu par mise à disposition au greffe et la minute a été signée par Monsieur Renaud DELOFFRE, Président

Source officielle
CE

3ème sous-section jugeant seule

CETAT:CETATEXT000028272375

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2013

4 décembre 2013

Vu la requête, enregistrée le 13 mars 2012 au secrétariat du contentieux du Conseil d'Etat, présentée par l'Union fédérale des cadres des fonctions publiques-CGC, dont le siège est 15-17, rue Beccaria

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219JUD001360105

Admin. suprême

19 février 2013

19 février 2013

    12 February 2004 the hearing was adjourned because both parties failed to appear. 16.     On 29 March 2004 the hearing was cancelled because the judge was ill. 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1208JUD004465406

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2011

8 décembre 2011

In particular, the hearings were adjourned twice because of the failure of the applicant to appear, twenty times due to the failure of the respondents or their representatives to appear, and twice because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1202JUD004213802

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2004

2 décembre 2004

Registration was refused because the car had not been properly registered in Belarus and its previous owner was not known. A criminal investigation was opened. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0519JUD005828219

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2022

19 mai 2022

In July 2017 the charges against K.P. were dismissed because she had fulfilled the aforementioned conditions. 3 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0618JUD000445709

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2019

18 juin 2019

S., a victim, also submitted an extraordinary appeal, arguing that the proceedings had been unfair because she had also not been summoned and that because the applicant had been convicted unfairly because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0509JUD003665805

Admin. suprême

9 mai 2017

9 mai 2017

They had decided to search her bag because such an action “was compatible with the law”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0322JUD001935509

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2022

22 mars 2022

As a result, the details of the conflict with Pte   K. became known among the members of Pte   Ye.F.’s new unit as well and he became shunned as a “rat”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0327DEC003791305

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2008

27 mars 2008

However, he claimed that he had been insulted and then dismissed because of his Hutu ethnicity.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1926511-2023530

Admin. suprême

22 février 2007

22 février 2007

She continued to hold citizenship of the former USSR until 31 December 2000 when she became a stateless person. She currently lives in Moscow.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0314DEC002327604

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2006

14 mars 2006

He maintained that he fell within the jurisdiction of all the respondent States because they were the occupying powers in Iraq, because he was under their direct authority and control or because they were

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0313DEC007223101

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2003

13 mars 2003

The hearing scheduled for 10 February 1998 was adjourned because the defendants did not appear. However, the court heard the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146046

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2014

7 juillet 2014

In the letter of 26   January 2011 addressed to the applicant’s mother it was found that there had been no possibility of placing the applicant in the therapeutic ward because of his legal status

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0106DEC001872005

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 2011

6 janvier 2011

    The applicant also complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that the decision on reverting her money to the State had not had a legal basis because Article 188 of the Criminal Code did

Source officielle

Page 47 sur 1524

← PrécédentSuivant →