CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-156194
17 juin 2015
She submitted that the applicant had not participated in K’s upbringing, had not visited him and had not paid any child maintenance. She therefore asked for child maintenance payment arrears.
Page 45 sur 385
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0714REP001137385
14 juillet 1988
In addition (the first applicant) has, as municipal child-minder, the care of a further child in the home.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1011JUD003187196
11 octobre 2001
child born out of wedlock is exercised by the child’s mother...”
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0212DEC003800005
12 février 2008
In the ordinary course the interest of parent and child are congruent. This is not so where a parent wilfully harms his child.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1011JUD003404596
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0125JUD001883007
25 janvier 2011
views freely in all matters affecting the child, the views of the child being given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child. 45.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410JUD007718011
10 avril 2018
He had always paid child maintenance and his income permitted him to give the child a good education.
ECLI:CEDH:001-211388
29 juin 2021
On 10 December 2018 the Gdańsk Regional Court granted the applicant’s and the Polish prosecutor’s applications and ordered that the child be returned to Belgium.
ECLI:CEDH:001-231186
22 janvier 2024
In his interim-order applications, the applicant mainly argued that the child’s mother had obstructed his contact with the child since January 2020.
2ème chambre jugeant seule
ECLI:FR:CECHS:2022:459163.20221019
19 octobre 2022
B A, Mme C D, épouse A, la SARL " Hôtel du Lion d'Or " et la SCI " Hôtel du Lion d'Or " ont demandé au tribunal administratif de Nîmes, d'une part, de condamner la commune de Saint-Chély-d'Apcher à leur
Tribunal Administratif de MELUN
DTA_2207782_20220817
17 août 2022
A a exercé ses fonctions au sein de la commune de Chailly-en-Bière.
ECLI:CEDH:001-145152
26 mai 2014
Parents or, as the case may be, legal guardians, have the primary responsibility for the upbringing and development of the child. The best interests of the child will be their basic concern.”
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12839
4 juin 2020
The applicants, two child protection associations, complained that the French authorities should have fulfilled their positive obligations to protect the child from ill-treatment by her parents which had
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0622JUD001137385
22 juin 1989
When a child is placed in a foster home, the aim should normally be to reunite the child and his parents.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0708JUD000958081
8 juillet 1987
(a) Reception of a child into care 45.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1212DEC001124084
12 décembre 1987
The child or parent on behalf of the child (except where the parent has not represented the child in the Juvenile Court) may appeal against the order to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0404DEC005137416
4 avril 2017
Even if X was a vulnerable child, she was not considered to be a child with care needs which were out of the ordinary.
ECLI:CEDH:002-4246
8 juillet 2004
Law : Article 2 – There was no clear legal definition in French law of the unborn child or a European consensus on the status of the embryo.
ECLI:CEDH:001-229560
16 novembre 2023
5705/2019 of 1 November 2019, the Athens One-Member Court of First Instance, after a private conversation between the judge and the child, acknowledged that the child had been illegally retained
ECLI:CEDH:001-231662
22 février 2024
She explained, both in her original application and in the appeal against the first-instance judgment, that on 5 September 2022, P.A.P., who had not seen the child for four years, had come to the