width:192.98pt; display:inline-block } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } FOURTH SECTION FINAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 58369/00 by Henryk WALL

Turkey - 11339/03 Judgment 6.3.2007 [Section II] Article 46 Article 46-2 Execution of judgment Continued detention pending the outcome of criminal proceedings that have been under way for almost thirteen

  4: The Court had already found the impugned prohibition to lack justification, given that the confidential information which the applicants possessed could be transmitted in a variety of ways which

In its judgment the Court found a breach of Article 6 of the Convention, in particular of the principle of legal certainty, on account of the annulment by way of an extraordinary appeal of a final court

    Alleged violation of Article 6 by quashing of the decision by way of supervisory review 14.

    Using the court as an instrument in that way could not be accepted in a democratic State governed by the rule of law.

  1 about the quashing by way of supervisory review of the final judgment of 3   June 2002.

They may be subject to limitations which do not restrict or reduce access in such a way or to such an extent that the very essence of the right is impaired (see De Geouffre de la Pradelle v.

the relevant judgment Start date End date Other complaints under well-established case-law     19753/18* 20/04/2018 Andrey Aleksandrovich ZUBAREV 1985     Cherepovets Town Court, by way

Wahl, Auditeur, - les conclusions de M. Vigouroux, Commissaire du gouvernement ; Considérant que d'une part la décision en date du 6 septembre 1982 enjoignant à M.

Wahl, Auditeur, - les observations de la SCP Waquet, avocat de M. Bruce X..., - les conclusions de M.

Wahl, Auditeur, - les conclusions de M.

Wahl, Auditeur, - les observations de Me Pradon, avocat de Mlle X..., - les conclusions de M.

Wahl, Auditeur, - les observations de la SCP Waquet, avocat de M. X..., - les conclusions de M.

Wahl, Auditeur, - les observations de la S.C.P. Nicolas, Masse-Dessen, Georges, avocat de M. Franck Y... Z..., - les conclusions de M.

Wahl, Auditeur, - les conclusions de M.

Wahl, Auditeur, - les observations de Me Blanc, avocat de M. X..., - les conclusions de M.

Wahl, Auditeur, - les observations de la SCP Waquet, avocat de M. Abdullah X..., - les conclusions de M. Vigouroux, Commissaire du gouvernement ; Considérant que le décret attaqué porte que M.