While the applicant's challenge to the decision of the Secretary of State on procedural grounds was dismissed, Mr Justice Richards also stated as follows in relation to the Convention issues: “...

    The applicants and the Government each filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1).

They are represented before the Court by Mr Richard Buxton, a lawyer practising in Cambridge, England. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.   A.

and Northern Ireland, lodged with the Commission in 1979 by four British citizens, namely John Nigel Courtenay James, Gerald Cavendish the Sixth Duke of Westminster, Patrick Geoffrey Corbett and Sir Richard

In the Court of Appeal Richards LJ held that the procedure adopted was compatible with article 6(2).

:inline-block } .s8C385EB3 { width:252.45pt; display:inline-block } .sFDD53DB9 { width:17.21pt; display:inline-block }       GRAND CHAMBER           CASE OF RICCARDI

the European Publishers’ Council, the Media Law Resource Center Inc., the Newspaper Association of America, BuzzFeed, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Index on Censorship, Professor Lorna Woods, Dr Richard

On 15   May 1996 he was also charged with aiding and abetting the attempted murder of the Prime Minister’s personal assistant, Richard Cachia Caruana.

DU TRIBUNAL LORS DES DÉBATS ET DU DÉLIBÉRÉ PRESIDENT : Dominique FERALI, Première vice-présidente ASSESSEUR : David LE MERCIER, Vice-Président ASSESSEUR : Grégoire MARTINEZ, GREFFIER : Karen RICHARD

Riffaud, conseiller, les observations de la SCP Lyon-Caen et Thiriez, avocat de la commune de [Localité 2], de la SCP Richard, avocat de la société V2W et de la société BR et associés, mandataire judiciaire

Julien Richaud, conseiller M.

; On 13 May 1987 the Commission decided, pursuant to Rule 40 para. 3 (b) of the Rules of Procedure, to invite the parties to submit further observations orally at a hearing on the admissibility and merits

The applicant was accused of having tried, by means of an instruction issued to third parties, to kill Mr   Richard Cachia Caruana, the personal assistant to the Prime Minister, on account of Mr Caruana's

    The applicant and the Government each filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1).

applicants on 25 April 1989 ;        -   the Commission's decision of 9 May 1989 to hold a hearing         on the admissibility and merits

The intervening Government were represented by Mr Clerides, Agent, assisted by Lord   Lester of Herne Hill QC, Mr Lowe QC, Mr Saini QC, Mr Richards and Mrs   Joannides, Counsel. A.

Richard Monteith, solicitor, Portadown, Northern Ireland who has submitted powers of attorney to this effect.

display:inline-block } .s93F6221 { width:237.26pt; display:inline-block } .s3CD0DB59 { width:217.77pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 37983/97 by Richard

the Kingdom of the Netherlands lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Netherlands national, Mr Richard