The first medical certificate, dated 21 February 2002, stated that the first applicant had sustained “light injuries” on her back and arms from being hit by a blunt object.

  The injuries had been inflicted through the impact of blunt objects four or five days previously, possibly on 28   February 2004.

He was kicked and hit with a blunt instrument against his legs. He was tied up hand and foot and, lying on the ground, he was forced to drag himself along using his knuckles.

  The Commission notes from the Supreme Court's judgment that the applicant was convicted because he made a blunt personal accusation in the absence of a reasonable factual basis whereas he could

The doctors concluded that the injuries could have been caused by blows with a blunt object with a limited surface area, possibly in the way described by the applicant. 9.

The injuries on the front of his head could have resulted from being punched with a blunt object, such as a fist. 26.

They further found that those injuries had been caused by a hard blunt object, that the abrasions, bruise and haemorrhage were likely to have been inflicted one to three days before the death, and the

qualité au siège social Représentant : Me Véronique BUQUET-ROUSSEL de la SCP BUQUET-ROUSSEL-DE CARFORT, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 462 - N° du dossier 11225 Plaidant : Me Guillaume BLUZET

    The applicant was born in 1961 and lives in Blumau. 6.     The applicant and his former partner, S.O., have two children, born out of wedlock in 2002 and 2004 respectively.

Briggs, a solicitor with Blount Petre Kramer in London. A.     The circumstances of the case The applicants are retired officers from the British armed forces.

The expert concluded that the bodily injuries had been caused by a “solid blunt object with a limited impact surface”, that the second applicant must have sustained them one to three days prior to the

The injuries could have been inflicted by a blunt object during a period from one to three days before the examination.

The expert concluded that these bruises had been caused by a hard and blunt object, possibly during the time and in the circumstances described by the applicant. 12 .

The doctor found hematomas on his buttocks and documented them in the applicant’s medical records as follows: “Skin hyperaemia on both buttocks, traces of blunt injury, blue hematomas.

The expert stated that the injuries had been caused by blunt solid objects; they could have been sustained in the circumstances described by the applicant. 18 .

Those injuries could have occurred shortly before his death and could have been caused by contact with blunt objects – such as the pistol bolt – when he had bowed his head with his arms crossed at the

on the bridge of the applicant’s nose, in the region of his left elbow, left forearm, right shin and left thigh would not cause harm to the applicant’s health and had been inflicted by the impact of blunt

The expert considered that the injuries on Mr Antonov’s head could have been due to convulsions which had caused an impact with blunt, solid objects. 21.

The expert also stated injuries on Mr Bykov’s body such as a bruise of the right elbow and an abrasion on the left knee which could have been caused by hitting against hard blunt objects possibly not long