CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 292 résultats pour « Silbert »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0512JUD002514807

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2020

12 mai 2020

The same page also included a printed message which stated, inter alia , that the person being questioned had the right to remain silent and the right to a lawyer of his or her choosing.

Source officielle

Page 40 sur 115

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0308JUD001061310

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2022

8 mars 2022

Both the applicant Mehmet Şahin and A.P. were interviewed in the presence of a lawyer and remained silent before the police.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1221JUD003688797

Admin. suprême

21 décembre 2000

21 décembre 2000

It notes that the text of section 52 of the 1939 Act is silent on this point.

Source officielle
CE

7ème et 2ème sous-sections réunies

CETAT:CETATEXT000026198983

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2012

13 juillet 2012

Martin Siloret, demeurant 25 rue de Vouziers à Rennes (35000), Mlle Gaëlle Audrain, demeurant 2 cours Sully à Nantes (44000) et Mlle Manon Hamon, demeurant 17 route de Saint-Savin à Saint-Etienne-de-Montluc

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0601JUD001568511

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2017

1 juin 2017

The experts added that in doing so the applicant had been speaking as if reciting a text memorised by heart and had remained silent when interrupted and asked for details or clarifications.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-157824

Admin. suprême

24 septembre 2015

24 septembre 2015

2008 62155/00 PROVIDE S.R.L. 05/07/2007 05/10/2007 39933/03 BUONFARDIECI 18/12/2007 18/03/2008 41062/05 CAPRIATI 26/07/2011 26/07/2011 20193/03+ PISCITELLI AND OTHERS 12/10/2010 12/01/2011 36624/02 SILVERI

Source officielle
CC

civ2

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2019:C210836

Cassation

28 novembre 2019

28 novembre 2019

expositions incriminées, au motif que : « L'analyse des circonstances de travail et les résultats dosimétriques ne peuvent expliquer les irradiations de plusieurs grays (supérieures à 10000 milli sieverts

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002863195

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1996

15 mai 1996

  The District Court observed that the applicant chose to remain silent and based its findings on the testimony of several witnesses, in particular the customs officers concerned and his superior

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-163528

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2016

12 mai 2016

The purchase agreement remained silent as to the title to the land. On an unspecified date the applicant’s family had another house measuring 395.3 sq. m (“house B”) built on the plot.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14252

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 2023

28 novembre 2023

The fact that the text of Article   4 was silent on whether it laid down a positive obligation to enable victims to sue their traffickers for loss of earnings was not decisive; specific obligations

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0110JUD003450716

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2023

10 janvier 2023

the admission of the absent witness’s untested statement as evidence: For all three witnesses the Court of Appeal’s rejection was based on the fact that the applicant had invoked his right to remain silent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146611

Admin. suprême

1 septembre 2014

1 septembre 2014

Before questioning, however, suspects would be cautioned, that is, informed of their right to remain silent and that anything they said could be taken down and produced as evidence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0920DEC003182004

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2007

20 septembre 2007

found in a judgment of 30 June 1999 (13Os86/99) that the relevant provision, namely section 6 § 3 of the Criminal Proceedings Compensation Act, which required the courts to hear the claimant but was silent

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2402041-2600818

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2008

30 juin 2008

It was found that, despite the fact that the applicant had been informed at the beginning of his trial of his right to remain silent and that all his earlier statements could not be used as evidence against

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0128DEC002583510

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2020

28 janvier 2020

According to the witnesses, about two weeks before the incident A.P. had become more distant and silent, fidgety and distracted. He had begun to worry a lot about his marks.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC003144609

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2013

22 janvier 2013

The applicant contended under Article 6 § 3 of the Convention that he had not been reminded of his rights – in particular, the right to a lawyer and the right to remain silent – while his statements were

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-193943

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2019

23 mai 2019

  (c)     Was the applicant informed of his basic rights such as the right to remain silent and the right to a lawyer when giving statements to the military public prosecutor during his

Source officielle
TCOM

DELIBERE CONTENTIEUX

69cab06ccdc6046d47878acf

Commerce

30 janvier 2026

30 janvier 2026

Composition du tribunal lors des débats et du délibéré : Président : THOMAS Emmanuel Juges : PARISOT Sylvie, BOUCQ Silvère, SCHILDKNECHT Stéphane MEUNIER Sébastien Assistés lors des débats par Me Valérie

Source officielle
TA

Juge Unique

DTA_2204040_20221025

Administratif

25 octobre 2022

25 octobre 2022

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme E ; - les observations de Me Siffert, représentant M.

Source officielle
TA

Tribunal Administratif de Lyon

DTA_2400474_20240429

Administratif

29 avril 2024

29 avril 2024

Par un mémoire en défense, enregistré le 19 février 2024, non communiqué, la société Groupama Rhône Alpes, en qualité d'assureur de la société Siffert, représentée par Me Pacifici (Selarl Tacoma), informe

Source officielle