Merits      The parties’ submissions    The applicants 33.

Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.

Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.

    The Court observes, however, that in their observations the parties also commented on the substantive limb of Article 2.

Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.

Admissibility Compatibility ratione materiae (a)    The parties’ submissions (i)       The Government 42 .

This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Has the first applicant been subjected to torture, or inhuman or degrading treatment, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention?

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Has there been a violation of Article   5 of the Convention?

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Has the applicant exhausted all effective domestic remedies, as required by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention?

The parties are invited to substantiate their claims with reference to relevant case-law of domestic courts.   2.

The above incidents were investigated as part of several criminal proceedings initiated on 28 February and 29 April 2014 and on 15 April, 25   April and 23 June 2016.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Was Article   6 §   1 of the Convention under its civil head applicable to the proceedings in the applicant’s case?   2.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

QUESTION AUX PARTIES La durée des procédures était-elle compatible avec la condition de jugement dans un « délai raisonnable », au sens de l’article 6 § 1 de la Convention (voir, parmi beaucoup d’autres

      QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

    QUESTIONS AUX PARTIES 1.