Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Karelin v.

    For a summary of the relevant domestic provisions and practice, see the case of Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§   22-37, 20 September 2016). THE LAW I.

    The relevant principles of the Court’s case-law concerning the requirement of impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention can be found in Karelin v.   Russia (no.

    Were the courts which dealt with the applicant’s case impartial, as required by Article 6   §   1 of the Convention (see Karelin v. Russia , no.

[M] [O] [Adresse 5] [Localité 3] Représenté par Me Laura DANJOUX suppléant Me Isabelle MABRUT de la SELARL KAEPPELIN-MABRUT, avocat au barreau de HAUTE-LOIRE INTIME Monsieur RUIN, Président

REGIONALE DE CREDIT AGRICOLE MUTUEL LOIRE HAUTE LOIRE - Siège social 94 Rue Bergson 42007 SAINT-ETIENNE CEDEX 1 Représentante : Me Barbara GUTTON-PERRIN (avouée à la Cour) - Représentant : la SCP KAEPPELIN

Représentante : Me Barbara GUTTON-PERRIN (avouée à la Cour) - Représentant : Me Paul KAEPPELIN (avocat plaidant - barreau du PUY-EN-VELAY) INTIME DEBATS : Après avoir entendu en application des

Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Karelin v.

  38544/97 , 4 July 2002, and Karelin v. Russia , no.   926/08, 20   September 2016)?

xa0;      Michel HERKENS 1935 belge Lasne Maître Ghysels                  Jacobus MARNEFFE 1925 belge Kapellen

Application no. 27215/17 also concerns the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia , no.   926/08, §§   69-85, 20 September 2016).

material before it, the Court concludes that these remaining complaints also disclose violations of Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention, as indicated in the appended table, in the light of its findings in Karelin

    The applicant also referred to the Court’s judgment in Karelin v.   Russia (no.

trial court in the administrative offence proceedings entail violations of the principles of the equality of arms, adversarial procedure and impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Karelin

    Did the absence of the prosecuting party in all three sets of proceedings result in a breach of the impartiality requirement under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention (see Karelin v.

articles   5 §   1 et   10 de la Convention, ainsi qu’à une autre violation de l’article   6 §   1 (pour défaut de partie représentant l’accusation au cours de la procédure – voir Karelin

the allegedly excessively active role of the trial court entail violations of the principles of the equality of arms, adversarial procedure and impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Karelin

    For a summary of the relevant domestic provisions and practice, see the case of Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§   22-37, 20 September 2016).

Par déclaration au greffe du 4 juillet 2025, la SELARL adValoria supplée par la SELARL Kaeppelin Mabrut, la société Point S France et la société Viasso ont formulé tierce opposition à l'encontre du jugement