entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme B, - les conclusions de Mme Delon, rapporteure publique, - les observations de Me Chaigneau, représentant Mme A, - et de Me Silleres

Par un mémoire en défense, enregistré le 6 février 2023, la commune de Montpellier représentée par Me Silleres et Me Rosier, avocats, membres de la société civile professionnelle (SCP) CGCB et Associés

Verguet, rapporteur ; - les conclusions de Mme Lorriaux, rapporteure publique ; - et les observations de Me Sillères, représentant le département de l'Hérault. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

    The applicant contended that the right to remain silent in criminal proceedings guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention was breached as he had been punished for remaining silent.

The applicant, however, had refused to testify as a witness, referring to her right to remain silent in her capacity as X.'s spouse.

Thierry Bataillard, rapporteur public, - et les observations de Me Ville et de Me Silbert, représentant la SAS Galien LPS. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

the applicant's right to silence was protected in domestic law, the Court notes that the applicant's lawyer was dismissed from the case by the investigator after having advised his client to remain silent

The applicant availed himself of his right to remain silent. His counsel conducted the defence.   The Regional Court gave judgment on 11 July 1995.

Slaves are silent!” and headed “Protect your subjects from brazen arbitrariness!”. The letter read as follows: “Dear Sirs, leaders of the region and the south of Russia!

protection sous plancher arrière cassées, - défaut d'étanchéité d'huile moteur à l'avant du véhicule, - défaut d'étanchéité important des vérins hydrauliques de suspension avant droit et gauche, - silent-bloc

violation of Article 6, paragraphs 1 and 3 d) of the Convention in that it had been impossible to examine or have examined prosecution witnesses who had died or had exercised their right to remain silent

       Devant la Commission il est représenté par Maître Michele Gentiloni Silverj, avocat au barreau de Rome.

Par des mémoires en défense enregistrés le 15 décembre 2022, le 2 juin 2023 et le 23 juin 2023, la société Gougaud Promotion, représentée par Me Siebert, conclut au rejet de la requête et à ce qu'il soit

Par un mémoire en défense, enregistré le 3 juillet 2024, la société Charier TP, représentée par Me Siebert, conclut au rejet de la requête et à ce que soit mise à la charge de la société Pigeon Terrassement

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 6 §§ 1 and 2 of the Convention that he had been subject to compulsion to give incriminating evidence in violation of the right to remain silent and the

However, the domestic courts had not requested the electoral commissions to submit those protocols to them for independent examination and had remained silent on that section of the applicant’s complaint

The judgment of the first-instance court was silent concerning her claim for provision of a living space.

In such specific circumstances the applicant could not have been expected to remain silent and not to defend her reputation in the same way.