Following the refusal by the Authority, the applicants communicated on various occasions with the Authority in order to have an explanation which was never tendered.

On the following day a reconstruction of the events was organised. 9.

Following the order the local authority made arrangements for access visits by the applicant and his wife on weekdays with the son visiting his parents at their home on Saturdays and Sundays.

        Following the removal of the children into care, the first applicant began taking amphetamines to which she became addicted.

In particular, Mr N.K. stated the following: “ [...]

       Following his release, the military prosecutor filed a new bill of indictment against the applicant.

Following the expiry of one of his fixed-term contracts on 30 June 1997, Mr Popov continued to work.

The case has been struck out following a friendly settlement in which he is to be paid ITL 13,000,000 for costs and any non-pecuniary damage. (Judgment in English.)

  Following the entry into force of Law no. 4126 of 27 October 1995, the National Security Court re-examined both cases.

B, représenté par Me Fozing, demande au tribunal d'annuler pour excès de pouvoir l'arrêté du juin 2024 par lequel le préfet de Seine-et-Marne l'a obligé à quitter le territoire français, a fixé le pays

Following the annulment of this judgment, it was the applicant who was ordered to pay certain sums to the tenants.

the Court in this case concerns the breach of the principle of legal certainty as a result of the annulment by the High Court of Cassation and Justice of a final judgment acquitting the applicant, following

144 August-September 2011 Ashendon and Jones v. the United Kingdom - 35730/07 Judgment 13.9.2011 [Section IV] Article 6 Article 6-2 Presumption of innocence Refusal to make defendants’ costs orders following

He was also examined on the following day. The applicant had difficulties in communicating with the health officer who spoke little English.

21 Chamber judgments, none of which are final [1] :   SECTION 1                    Violation Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 In the following 20

    Following numerous hearings and the suspension of the proceedings on account of the death of several respondents, the Szolnok District Court delivered judgment on 19 December 2006.

  Immediately following the judgment a memorandum interpreting and explaining the legal consequences of the judgment was produced.

On 13 May 1988, following an acquittal in the criminal proceedings, a labour court annulled the AVTOTEHNA’s decision concerning the applicant’s dismissal.

Following his confession and signed written statement, criminal proceedings were brought against him. He was also subsequently charged with several counts of fraud, unrelated to the robbery.

publicly, on the day following the date on which the final decision is served on the applicant or his representative, and expires six calendar months later, irrespective of the actual length of those