CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE — 26 septembre 2012

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s5EE9E87A { font-size:6.67pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } .s421F9159 { font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s97D52449 { width:7.02pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sFE832CA2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:18pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sBFC49883 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s23ADBB69 { font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s116BEA21 { font-size:8pt } .s34FA7803 { font-size:8pt; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Résolution CM/ResDH(2012)117 [1] Osman contre Danemark Exécution de l’arrêt de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme   (Requête n o 38058/09, arrêt du 14 juin 2011, définitif le 14 septembre 2011)     Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit qu’il surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci-après nommées «   la Convention   » et «   la Cour   »),   Vu l’arrêt définitif, qui a été transmis par la Cour au Comité dans l’affaire ci-dessus et la violation constatée (voir document DH-DD(2012)465E ) ;   Rappelant l’obligation de l’Etat défendeur, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe   1, de la Convention, de se conformer aux arrêts définitifs dans les litiges auxquels il est partie et que cette obligation implique, outre le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour, l’adoption par les autorités de l’Etat défendeur, si nécessaire   :   -      de mesures individuelles pour mettre fin aux violations constatées et en effacer les conséquences, dans la mesure du possible par restitutio in intergrum   ; et -      de mesures générales permettant de prévenir des violations semblables ;   Ayant invité le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur à informer le Comité des mesures prises pour se conformer aux obligations susmentionnés   ;   Ayant examiné le bilan d’action fourni par le Gouvernement indiquant les mesures adoptées afin d’exécuter l’arrêt y compris les informations fournies en ce qui concerne le paiement de la satisfaction équitable octroyée par la Cour (voir document DH-DD(2012)465E )   ;   S’étant assuré que toutes les mesures requises par l’article 46, paragraphe 1, ont été adoptées   ;   DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention dans cette affaire et   DECIDE d’en clore l’examen. Action Report: Osman v. Denmark, Application no. 38058/09   The facts   The applicant was a Somali national who lived in Somalia from her birth in 1987 till 1991 and in Kenya from 1991 to 1995. At the age of 7 the applicant came to Denmark where she resided till the age of 15. She spoke Somali and Danish and went to school in Denmark until August 2002. All her close family members live in Denmark. Her father sent her back to Kenya- allegedly against her will- in 2003, when she was 15, where she took care of her paternal grandmother at the Hagadera refugee camp in north-eastern Kenya for more than two years. In August 2005, aged 17 and therefore still a minor, she applied to be reunited with her mother and sib­ lings in Denmark. This application was rejected since her residence permit had lapsed, because she had been absent from Denmark for more than 12 consecutive months, and there were no special circumstances to support granting a new residence permit. The applicant allegedly re-entered Den­ mark illegally in June 2007.   Convention violation found   In its judgments delivered on 14 June 2011 The European Court of Human Rights found that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention (right to respect for private and family life), because the applicant’s interests had not been taken into account in the authorities’ refusal to renew her Danish residence permit and a fair balance had not been struck between her interests and the State’s interest in controlling immigration. As reparation for the non-pecuniary damage suffered, the Court awarded the Applicant a sum of 15.000 EUR and a further sum of 6.000 EUR as reimbursement for costs and expenses.   Individual measures   The compensation awarded in the sum of 21.000 EUR /156.284,10 DKK was transferred to Ms. Osman’s bank account on 26 September 2011. The exchange rate was 100 EUR = 744,21 DKK at the time of transfer. A copy of the relevant accounting entry is annexed.   Following the judgment the Ministry decided to reinstate Ms. Osman’s residence permit. Ms. Osman was informed thereof by decision of 28 October 2011.   General measures   A summary in Danish of the judgment was published in the periodical ‘EU-ret og Menneskeret’ (EU Law and Human Righs Law). It can be found in issue no. 4/2011, page 301.   Furthermore, a summary in Danish of the judgment was published via the link ‘juni 2011’ (June 2011) at the webpage of the Ministry of Justice: www.jm.dk [2] .   The judgment was also disseminated to the relevant Danish authorities including: The Ministry for Refugee, Immigration and Integration Affairs (Ministry of Integration), The Supreme Court, The High Court of Eastern Denmark and The City Court of Copenhagen.   Immediately following the judgment a memorandum interpreting and explaining the legal consequences of the judgment was produced. This memorandum was made public on 8 July 2011 on the webpage of the Ministry of Integration: www.nyidanmark.dk [3] .   The memorandum was also sent to the Danish Institute for Human Rights (NHRI) and the Danish Parliament (The Immigration and Integration Affairs Committee).   Following the judgment and production of the memorandum two parliamentary hearings were held on the issue of residence permits for minors following ‘re-education journeys’.   On the webpage mentioned above, www.nyidanmark.dk , a news bulletin was published on the front page where it was explained that it is possible to have decisions reconsidered where a residence permit has lapsed or where an application for a residence permit has been refused due to a long stay abroad in the framework of a re-education travel. The news bulletin is available in Danish, English, Arabic, Dari, Farsi, French, Mandarin, Somali, Turkish and Urdu. In order to stay on the front page the date of the news bulletin is continuously updated.   It is the position of the Government that the publication and dissemination of the judgment as mentioned above is sufficient to prevent similar violations in the future.   [1] Adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 26 septembre 2012 lors de la 1150e réunion des Délégués des Ministres. [2] Deep link: http://www.justitsministeriet.dk/praksis.html [3] Deep link: http://www.nyidanmark.dkiNR/rdonlyres/90025217-0887-4228-88BF-89BAE159E196/0/notat_af_8_juli_2011.pdf