CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2025:C100713
5 novembre 2025
Sur le rapport de Mme Peyregne-Wable, conseillère, les observations de la SARL Matuchansky, Poupot, Valdelièvre et Rameix, avocat de la société Althéa gestion, de la SARL Boré, Salve de Bruneton et Mégret
Page 37 sur 1364
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2026:C100051
21 janvier 2026
Sur le rapport de Mme Peyregne-Wable, conseillère, les observations de la SCP Gatineau, Fattaccini et Rebeyrol, avocat de M.
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2025:C100764
26 novembre 2025
Sur le rapport de Mme Peyregne-Wable, conseillère, les observations de la SARL Le Prado - Gilbert, avocat de Mme [G] veuve [S], de Mme [S] et de MM.
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2025:C100763
Sur le rapport de Mme Peyregne-Wable, conseillère, les observations de la SARL Boré, Salve de Bruneton et Mégret, avocat de la société [E] [P], représentée par son liquidateur amiable Mme [E] [P], de la
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-226527
3 novembre 2009
Walls, a lawyer practicing in Dordrecht. A. The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
CASELAW;STATEMENTOFFACTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2810000-3075502
23 novembre 2009
ECLI:CEDH:001-204299
7 juillet 2020
Upon arrival, he was taken to a room where he was ordered to stand facing the wall and several men hit him on the inner thighs for 10 minutes. They also threatened to rape him.
ECLI:CEDH:001-226528
Walls, a lawyer practising in Dordrecht. A. The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2810010-3075512
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1206DEC001885506
6 décembre 2011
1 about non ‑ enforcement of the judgment in his favour and its subsequent quashing by way of supervisory review were concerned.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0329JUD004071304
29 mars 2011
Quashing by way of supervisory review 8.
Tribunal Administratif de Lille
DTA_2600452_20260202
2 février 2026
Fer Recup 59 pour son installation située sur la commune de Wallers ; 2°) de mettre à la charge de l’Etat, le versement d’une somme de 2 500 euros au titre de l’article L. 761-1 du code de justice
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0914DEC001019508
14 septembre 2010
The applicant was told to squat against the wall.
TRIBUNAL_UE
ECLI:EU:T:1998:59
19 mars 1998
#Gerard van der Wal contra Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002636795
15 mai 1996
The latter property had a right of way (tieoikeus, vägrätt) over a six-metre-wide road encumbering the applicants' property.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1206DEC002482206
On 29 December 2005 the Presidium of the Rostov Regional Court quashed the judgment of 15 September 2004 by way of supervisory review and referred the case for a fresh examination by a different court.
ECLI:CEDH:001-123827
11 juillet 2013
The applicant subsequently petitioned the Prosecutor General to exercise his discretionary power to challenge these decisions by way of an extraordinary appeal on points of
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13821
11 octobre 2022
Although all financial benefits generally had a certain effect on the way in which the family life of the person concerned was managed, that fact alone was not sufficient to bring them within the ambit
ECLI:CEDH:001-119182
3 avril 2013
According to the first applicant, she was not summoned to the questioning in a usual way.
ECLI:CEDH:002-3075
30 novembre 2006
Autonomous Commercial Port authorities likewise requested the valuation department to calculate, in accordance with the general law on expropriation, the amount that would be payable to the applicants by way