Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-247820
26 novembre 2025
26 novembre 2025
The applicant complains of a disproportionate interference with her property rights contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-173662
26 avril 2017
26 avril 2017
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression and/or freedom of assembly, contrary to Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention (see Cumpǎnǎ and Mazǎre
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-208000
20 janvier 2021
20 janvier 2021
The applicant complains the ruling of the domestic courts was contrary to the principle of legal certainty and therefore breached her rights guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196816
16 septembre 2019
16 septembre 2019
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his correspondence, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-208396
3 février 2021
3 février 2021
The applicant complains that the quashing of the final judgment in such circumstances was contrary to the principle of legal certainty and breached his rights guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 and Article 1
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-247819
26 novembre 2025
26 novembre 2025
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ freedom to leave the territory of the respondent State, contrary to Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 (see Khlyustov v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179705
27 novembre 2017
27 novembre 2017
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, on account of the criminal proceedings brought against him before the
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6574
6 septembre 1999
6 septembre 1999
Law : The Court recalled that it had found in four judgments of 28 July 1999 that there existed in Italy a practice contrary to the Convention, resulting from an accumulation of breaches of the "reasonable
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-217015
24 mars 2022
24 mars 2022
He complains before the Court that the prolongation of his detention by the Râșcani District Court on 15 November 2017 was unlawful and contrary to Article 5 § 1 of the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-222977
9 janvier 2023
9 janvier 2023
The applicant, in essence, alleges that he is not provided with an opportunity to rehabilitate himself and that, as a result, his life sentence is de facto irreducible, contrary to Article 3 of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-191601
13 février 2019
13 février 2019
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis , Jäggi v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223097
16 janvier 2023
16 janvier 2023
The case concerns application of a provision of domestic law (first paragraph of Article 88 of Notary Act) by the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court in a manner that was allegedly unforeseeable and contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55441
12 février 1987
12 février 1987
Rights under Article 25 (art. 25) of the convention by a German citizen, Mr Klaus Dieter Deumeland, complaining that the social courts had not given his case a fair hearing within a reasonable time contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196333
6 septembre 2019
6 septembre 2019
banned them from becoming founding members, ordinary members, leaders or auditors of any other political party for five years constitute a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of association contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201487
28 janvier 2020
28 janvier 2020
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, with regard to the manner in which the authorities responded
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-220234
27 septembre 2022
27 septembre 2022
Has the applicant suffered gender-based discrimination contrary to Article 14 of the Convention, read in conjunction with Articles 3 and 8 § 1 of the Convention (see, for example
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225811
13 juin 2023
13 juin 2023
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-241838
13 janvier 2025
13 janvier 2025
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention, taken alone and read in the light of Article
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-217174
6 avril 2022
6 avril 2022
Was the delay in admitting the applicant to a hospital excessive and contrary to Article 5 § 1 ( Pankiewicz v. Poland , no. 34151/04, §§ 44-45, 12 February 2008)?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-228311
18 septembre 2023
18 septembre 2023
In the light of the applicant’s claims and the documents which have been submitted, did the applicant’s forcible removal to Turkey expose him to a real risk of treatment contrary to Article
Source officiellePage 36 sur 1005