CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 18 septembre 2023
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-228311
- Date
- 18 septembre 2023
- Publication
- 18 septembre 2023
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 9 October 2023   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 60004/18 Mehmet GELEN against Azerbaijan lodged on 28 January 2019 communicated on 18 September 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant is a Turkish national who worked in private schools affiliated to the Gülen movement in Azerbaijan. Relying mainly on Articles   3, 5 and 13 of the Convention, the applicant complains that his detention and subsequent forcible removal from Azerbaijan to Turkey were in breach of his Convention rights. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     In the light of the applicant’s claims and the documents which have been submitted, did the applicant’s forcible removal to Turkey expose him to a real risk of treatment contrary to Article   3 of the Convention (see Shenturk and Others v. Azerbaijan , nos. 41326/17 and 3 others, §§ 112-17, 10 April 2022)?   2.     Was the applicant deprived of his liberty in breach of Article   5 §   1 (f) of the Convention? In particular, has the applicant’s detention from 21 to 28   December 2018 been “in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law” and based on any judicial or administrative detention (see Shenturk and   Others , cited above, §§ 100-07)?   3.     Did the applicant have at his disposal an effective domestic remedy for his complaints under Articles 3 and 5 of the Convention, as required by Article   13 of the Convention?Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 18 septembre 2023
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-228311
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel