The criminal proceedings against the applicant were still pending at the time of the European Court’s judgment.

    In a final decision of 27   April 2006 the Iaşi County Court upheld the previous decision.

    The application was allocated to the Fourth Section of the Court (Rule   52 §   1 of the Rules of Court).

On 7 May 1986 he was informed by the Ministry that if he claimed such a right to a piece of property he should file an application with the County Administrative Board (Länsstyrelsen).

Nevertheless, as the Court had noted in Šilih v.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, FINANCIERE ET ECONOMIQUE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué (Versailles, 9 octobre 2003), que, le 21

Assize Court. 14.

On 15 April 2016 the Timișoara Court of Appeal examined in detail the decisions rendered by the County Court on 7 April 2016, including on the point concerning the alleged unlawfulness of the prosecutor

The District Court’s judgment of 17   October 1997 The applicant was convicted on eight counts, found not guilty on two counts and sentenced to fourteen months’ imprisonment.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique tenue au Palais de Justice à PARIS, le dix-huit avril deux mille, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le rapport

The trial court dismissed the request, stating that the expert report was sufficiently detailed and clear, and that an assessment of the expert’s qualifications was outside the court’s jurisdiction.

ADMINISTRATIVE Le 11 avril 2026 à Nous, Coralie COUSTY, Juge au Tribunal judiciaire de LYON, assistée de Maureen JANIER, greffier.

oral evidence given before the trial court without rehearing it.

, New Court et Foncière New Court, a été ordonné avec effet au 1er octobre 2020.

On 18 March 2013 the Warsaw District Court, sitting as a court officer ( referendarz sądowy ) (case no.

court, in the applicants’ view, five of those awards had nevertheless not reflected adequate compensation, in line with the Court’s guiding principles established in Cauchi (cited above).

She appealed and on 20 April 1995 the Siedlce Regional Court ( Sąd Wojewódzki ) quashed the District Court’s judgment and remitted the case for re-examination.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique tenue au Palais de Justice à PARIS, le onze mai deux mille, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le rapport de

LA COUR DE CASSATION, DEUXIÈME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Donne acte à M.