Babić, a lawyer practising in Split. The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. 3.

Moreover, unlike M.A. the State-appointed lawyer was not a specialist in helping applicants to prepare applications to the Strasbourg Court.

A la demande des époux X..., un administrateur provisoire, un administrateur judiciaire, puis finalement un syndic judiciaire en la personne de l'AGENCE LAMY puis de M.

On both days they were questioned in the absence of a lawyer. 25.

Hervé Alexandre XWW..., demeurant ..., 628 / de M. Marcel Guy XWX..., demeurant ..., 629 / de M. Jean Pierre XWA..., demeurant ..., 630 / de M.

They further provided for the convict’s right to be represented by a lawyer at the hearing. 17.

Horvat, a lawyer practising in Zagreb. The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. 3.

    By a joint written submission of 20 February 2014, R.F., the lawyer of the first applicant and that of the lawyer representing the fourth applicant, the former also in the name of the second

133.42pt; display:inline-block } .sA3D40E95 { width:52.56pt; display:inline-block } .sA8847899 { width:93.07pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 26022/20 Maria Alexandra

  Alexandra Maria Popescu v. Romania (no. 9684/04)* Seceleanu and Others v. Romania (no. 2915/02) Emilian Ştefănescu v.

chambre ARRÊT DU 09 JANVIER 2025 Décision déférée à la cour : jugement du tribunal judiciaire de Nîmes en date du 14 février 2023, N°19/01300 COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DES DÉBATS : Mme Alexandra

Vînătoru 17/03/1955,   represented by Gabriela Virginia Enea, a lawyer practising in Craiova Filiași District Court, 02/05/2007         Dolj County Court, 03/10/2007   &#

agissant en la personne de ses représentants légaux domiciliés audit siège Représentée par Me Frédérique ETEVENARD, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : K0065 Assistée de Me Laurie-Anne LECALVEZ de LAMY

They were not able to see a lawyer. Mr Ilaşcu was able to see his lawyer for the first time several months after his arrest, in September 1992.

The applicant had himself appointed a lawyer for the whole duration of the proceedings, but he maintained that the authorities had failed to notify his lawyer of the hearings held on 21 July and 9 August

  In the Court’s view, these circumstances justify the conclusion that the conduct of the applicant’s lawyer failed to respect the rule of confidentiality. 20.

him in court hearings, AZN 400 for each lawyer for preparing the appeal against detention, AZN 500 for each lawyer for preparing the request for release on bail, AZN 500 for each lawyer for preparing

No lawyer was present.

But this judge and her lay assessors are in no doubt as to the woman’s guilt.