Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1209DEC003832197
9 décembre 1999
9 décembre 1999
By judgment of the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court ( Oberlandesgericht ), dated 7 March 1994, the applicant was sentenced to a prison term of 6 years for membership in a terrorist organisation
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1015DEC003645302
15 octobre 2013
15 octobre 2013
The SUOR lodged an appeal in cassation to the Higher Commercial Court of Ukraine (“the Higher Commercial Court”).
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1015
29 mars 2010
29 mars 2010
The French naval authorities accordingly had the Winner intercepted on the high seas off Cape Verde and escorted to the French port of Brest.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1110DEC002393110
10 novembre 2015
10 novembre 2015
In its final decision adopted on 22 October 2009, the High Court of Cassation and Justice upheld the previous decisions. B. Relevant domestic law 8.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0116JUD002750918
16 janvier 2024
16 janvier 2024
In reply to the applicant’s appeal against the extension, a public prosecutor from the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office (“the higher public prosecutor”) made a written submission which was not communicated
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-214425
24 novembre 2021
24 novembre 2021
The High Court on Appeal The applicant appealed the extradition order to the High Court, and judgment was delivered on 28 April 2021.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201629
7 février 2020
7 février 2020
On 29 July 2016 the High Court ( lagmannsretten ) refused leave to appeal.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-180430
4 janvier 2018
4 janvier 2018
CLXI of 2011 on the Organisation and Administration of the Judiciary, the Szolnok High Court to try the applicants, instead of the geographically competent Budapest High Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-212661
29 septembre 2021
29 septembre 2021
By the final decision of 5 December 2012, the Higher Specialized Court in Civil and Criminal Matters granted both claims of the applicant’s brother, holding, inter alia , that the non-payment of
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205031
7 septembre 2020
7 septembre 2020
FIFTH SECTION Application no. 38977/19 Igor Leonovych SAMSIN against Ukraine lodged on 18 July 2019 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant, at the time a Supreme Court judge, was the chairman of the High
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223093
18 janvier 2023
18 janvier 2023
The applicant’s appeals were examined on the merits and were ultimately rejected by the High Commercial Court on 13 January 2016 and by the Supreme Court on 20 April 2016.
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Montreuil
ORTA_2515070_20250904
4 septembre 2025
4 septembre 2025
Il soutient que : - la condition d’urgence est remplie, dès lors qu’il doit justifier lors de l’audience de la High Court fixée le 31 octobre 2025 de sa capacité à entrer et à séjourner sur le territoire
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-219470
21 février 2022
21 février 2022
On 10 July 2012 the Higher Commercial Court of Ukraine upheld the decisions of the lower courts finding the contract and, as a consequence, the arbitration clause, invalid.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710DEC000119510
10 juillet 2012
10 juillet 2012
Appeal to the High Court 10.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0729JUD004229798
29 juillet 2004
29 juillet 2004
The High Court heard the case on 5-7 May 1992, legal submissions were heard on 23 June 1992 and the court reserved its judgment.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0614JUD003441710
14 juin 2022
14 juin 2022
In high-security establishments and in high-security sections of other institutions, such activities shall be carried out in groups of no more than ten persons.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD006606909
17 janvier 2012
17 janvier 2012
A l’issue de la procédure, la High Court fixe une période minimale d’emprisonnement ou impose la perpétuité réelle. 10.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0329DEC000569213
29 mars 2022
29 mars 2022
CLXI of 2011 on the Organisation and Administration of the Judiciary, the Szolnok High Court to try the applicants, instead of the prima facie competent Budapest High Court. 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11595
7 mars 2017
7 mars 2017
In August 2016 the High Judiciary Council, sitting in plenary session, applied that provision and removed 2,847 judges, including the applicant, from office.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-13238
20 avril 2021
20 avril 2021
La High Court donna gain de cause au Trust et la requérante fit appel, en vain.
Source officiellePage 29 sur 1366