(e)     to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court.”

    Between October 1993 and March 1994 the investigator examined witnesses, appointed technical experts and collected other evidence.

    On 22 March 2011 the Supreme Court ( Najvyšší súd ) declared the appeal on points of law inadmissible.

ANNEXE à l’ordonnance n° 2201111 du XXX N° de parcelle Nom du propriétaire Localisation parcelle Adresse de correspondanceAT 236 LEGROS Nicolas et SOMBSTHAY Marie 9 rue Cherche midi 3 avenue du

which the Russian Federation ceased to be a member of the Council of Europe as from 16   March 2022.

A prison officer, who was training in sign language, attended the hearing and acted as interpreter for M.

    In August 2013, a report was drawn up on the language analysis test carried out by the Office for Country Information and Language Analysis ( Bureau Land en Taal ), a specialised unit of

Par des mémoires, enregistrés les 2 mars, 29 juillet et 16 septembre 2021, M.

    On 22 March 2011 a report was issued following a language analysis test – taken by the applicant in December 2010 – by the Office for Country Information and Language Analysis ( Bureau Land

Article XV ... (2) Hungary shall guarantee the fundamental rights to everyone without discrimination based on any ground such as race, colour, sex, disability, language, religion, political or any other

Further to the European Court's judgment in the case of Podkolzina against Latvia, the law on election to Parliament was amended on 9 May 2002 and the provisions requiring higher proficiency in Latvian language

that there was “no evidence of any direct participation by Russian agents in the measures taken against the applicants”, nor “any evidence of Russian involvement in or approbation for the ‘MRT’s’ language

[F] & [X] [Adresse 6] [Localité 3] représentée par Me Elise LANGLOIS, demeurant [Adresse 1], avocat au barreau de Dijon, S.A.S.

Par une requête et des mémoires enregistrés les 8 décembre 2021, 6 février 2023 et 31 mars 2023, sous le n° 2110754, Mme K F, M. L C, M. D I, Mme J Langlois, M.

Malta (no. 69122/10, 11 February 2014, §   60) – the fact remains that to speak of “unfortunate language used” and then to distinguish between unfortunate language that is in violation of the presumption

  69729/12, §§   84-90, 3   March 2020)?   1.2.

] [Adresse 3] [Localité 2] comparante en personne DÉFENDEUR AU RECOURS : Maître [B] [K] SCP BOBEE [K] et Associés [Adresse 1] [Localité 2] représenté par Me Nathalie DEVILLERS-LANGLOIS

On 20 March 2019 the Court decided to indicate to the respondent Government, under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, that the applicant should not be removed from Turkey until further notice.