He requested the Supreme Court to quash the High Court's decision. 20.

On 18 January 2006 the Higher Administrative Court rejected the applicant’s appeal in cassation as unsubstantiated.

with the High Court which stated that the dog was not of the relevant type.

Prisoners whose tariff was set by the Secretary of State under the previous practice may apply to the High Court for a review.

The High Court upheld this decision on 8 November 2007. 16 .

MOTIFS DE LA DECISION 1- Sur l'intervention volontaire de la société HIGH STREET RETAIL VALORISATION 1 La HIGH STREET RETAIL VALORISATION 1 expose intervenir volontairement à la procédure en tant que

An application for permission to appeal can be made to the High Court or the Court of Appeal. If an application is made to the High Court, a further application can be made to the Court of Appeal.

It comprised fourteen persons, including the persons already sued by the estate in bankruptcy before the High Court.

Before the High Court the applicant was ordered to pay costs in the amount of approximately 800 euros, covering his counsel’s fee.

She sought a review of that decision by the High Court of Cassation and Justice, which   upheld it. Law – Article   6 §   1: 1.

On 6 April 2016, upon appeal by the applicants, the High Court upheld the lower court’s decision. 9 .

2021 APPELANT : [G] [E] né le [Date naissance 1] 1974 à [Localité 8] [Adresse 3] [Localité 5] représenté par Me Thierry PERON, avocat au barreau de LYON INTIMÉE : SAS AKKA HIGH

#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari: High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division - ir-Renju Unit.#Ammonti ta' kumpens monetarju.#Kawża 146/77.

#Begäran om förhandsavgörande: High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court - Förenade kungariket.#Vasslepulver - Återbetalning av felaktigt uppburna belopp.#Mål 130/79.

. # Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division - Spojené kráľovstvo. # Voľný pohyb osôb. # Vec 131/79.

. # Société anonyme des laminoirs, hauts fourneaux, forges, fonderies et usines de la Providence and others v High Authority of the ECSC. # Joined cases 29, 31, 36, 39 to 47, 50 and 51-63.

    The applicant and the prosecutor lodged appeals before the Prague High Court ( Vrchní soud ) . 11.

The applicants brought proceedings against the Ministry of Defence in the Military Administrative High Court, seeking damages, but they were unsuccessful.

On 21 January 2011 the latter forwarded the claim to the Higher Administrative Court following yet another change in legislation regarding jurisdiction in such cases.

On 6 December 2005 the Maribor Higher Court granted the appeal and remitted the case back to the first instance court.