xa0; THIRD SECTION Application no. 56693/21 Nikolaos ANAGNOSTAKIS against Greece lodged on 10 November 2021 communicated on 7 December 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant is the father of a child

It noted that the child R. had expressed that he felt as a full member of the K. family and that he strongly wished to be legally accepted as Mr K.’s child.

On 9 May 2008 the first applicant took the child to the Centre for a meeting with the father.

The decision to allow [E.K.] and her parents to visit the child would require the return of the child to a child-care facility.

of a child.

of the child.

going through iron doors, had caused his child distress.

to see the child outside the mother’s residence. 15.

The City Court took into account that the child had been living with her father since birth, that she had been emotionally attached to him, that V. had been providing the child with required care, including

In this context, the child clearly showed her refusal to see her father.

CHAILLY RESORT Représentée par Me Florian DA SILVA de la SELAS BARTHELEMY AVOCATS, avocat au barreau de LYON, vestiaire : 1698 INTIME [L] [D] Représenté par Me Sandrine ANNE, avocat au barreau de

CHAILLY RESORT Représentée par Me Florian DA SILVA de la SELAS BARTHELEMY AVOCATS, avocat au barreau de LYON, vestiaire : 1698 INTIME [H] [Y] Représenté par Me Sandrine ANNE, avocat au barreau de

It found that her detention was incompatible with the Convention on the Rights of the Child signed in New York in 1989.

married in 1937, thus legitimating A., a child born to her out of wedlock in 1936.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, concern her unsuccessful attempt to have civil paternity established for her minor child, who was born out of wedlock on 3 May 2007,

The applicant had been declared the father of the child in the absence of a DNA test.

Facts – In 2008 the applicant’s former wife took their child from Moldova, where they lived, to Russia without the applicant’s consent.

By an order of 15 January 1992, the Principal Public Prosecutor's Office placed the child into the care of the Child-Welfare Office (ASE) for the Rhône département .