under both schemes in respect of the different activities carried out within their company. 9.

They are both British nationals who live in Sheffield, United Kingdom.

  1 in respect of Serbia and Slovenia and held that both States should make all necessary arrangements, including legislative amendments, to allow relevant persons to recover their savings.

xa0; SECOND SECTION Applications nos. 9044/17 and 48545/17 Peep HAVIK against Estonia and Andres VAIK against Estonia lodged on 20 January 2017 and 4 July 2017 respectively SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES Both

  Croatia , 37685/10, 28   June 2016] Both cases concerned claims to the acquisition of plots of land through adverse possession.

On 14 February 2006 both applicants and Mr M.F. were sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment each.

By letters dated 16 May 2022 the Registry informed both applicants that the Government had not submitted their observations within the given time ‑ limit.

  The applicants in both cases complain that the impossibility of one parent to obtain joint custody over the children in the absence of the other parent’s consent was not justified in the interests

In his view, the authorities of both Contracting Parties should have verified that aspect and not proceed with issuing or executing the EAW.

Starting-point: in both cases, request for formal confirmation of decision. End: in both cases, decision of the Central Appeals Tribunal.

  23927/94) brought by Kamil Tekin Sürek and Yücil Özdemir, both Turkish nationals.

  1 in respect of Serbia and Slovenia and held that both States should make all necessary arrangements, including legislative amendments, to allow relevant persons to recover their savings.

  Croatia , 22768/12, 28   June 2016] Both cases concerned claims to the acquisition of plots of land through adverse possession.

Following remittal of the case by the Supreme Court to the appellate court concerning the applicants’ acquittal on the robbery charge and certain reclassification issues, the appellate court found both

C..., représenté par Me Bohner, demande au tribunal : d’annuler l’arrêté du 17 octobre 2024 par lequel le préfet du Bas-Rhin lui a refusé la délivrance d’un titre de séjour, lui a fait obligation de

G..., représentés par Me Bohner, demandent au juge des référés : 1°) d’ordonner, sur le fondement des dispositions de l’article L. 521-1 du code de justice administrative, la suspension de l’exécution

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête enregistrée le 27 juin 2022 et des pièces complémentaires du 15 août 2022, Mme A, représentée par Me Bohner, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté

Gros, magistrat désigné ; - les observations de Me Bohner, représentant Mme C, qui conclut aux mêmes fins que la requête, par les mêmes moyens.

Conclusion : violation in respect of both applicants (unanimously).

Echasserieau, juge des référés, - les observations de Me Régent, substituant Me Bohner, représentant M.