Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-168652
13 octobre 2016
13 octobre 2016
QUESTION Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, through the authorities’ decision not to terminate the public care
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-210124
20 avril 2021
20 avril 2021
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant company’s right to freedom of expression, in particular its right to impart information and/or ideas, contrary to Article
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-114200
2 octobre 2012
2 octobre 2012
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, in so far as the publication of extracts of the prosecution file
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-217851
9 mai 2022
9 mai 2022
In the alternative, has there been a breach of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention due to the lack of medical treatment in prison
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-194925
5 juillet 2019
5 juillet 2019
The applicant complains that he has been subjected to ill-treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention and that the authorities have failed to conduct an effective investigation into those allegations
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-217835
18 mai 2022
18 mai 2022
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the grounds of his sex, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218039
24 mai 2022
24 mai 2022
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention ( Ilya Lyapin v. Russia , no.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-186725
11 septembre 2018
11 septembre 2018
Has the applicant suffered discrimination contrary to Article 14 of the Convention in conjunction with Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-192537
19 mars 2019
19 mars 2019
The applicant complains under Articles 6, 13 and 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the fact that the dismissal of his appeal on points of law was contrary to the law.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-235232
24 juin 2024
24 juin 2024
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention (see, amongst others, Brosa v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-197162
3 octobre 2019
3 octobre 2019
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention (see Patyi and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-170893
13 janvier 2017
13 janvier 2017
Has there been a violation of the applicant company’s right to freedom of expression, in particular its right to impart information and ideas, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1316
6 octobre 2009
6 octobre 2009
1: The applicants complained mainly that the ethics lessons were not neutral and that their secular nature was contrary to their religious beliefs.
Source officiellePRESS;GCREFERRALS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-957039-986455
12 mars 2004
12 mars 2004
On 29 June 1995 some of the applicants brought their case before the Federal Constitutional Court, arguing, among other things, that certain provisions of that Act were contrary to basic law, in
Source officielleCASELAW;STATEMENTOFFACTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3416663-3835935
14 février 2011
14 février 2011
The court held that the applicant’s allegations were negative and that, under the law in force, they were to be considered untrue unless the contrary was proved.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-172791
13 mars 2017
13 mars 2017
The court established that, contrary to the applicable legislation, the psychiatrist had failed to obtain the applicant’s consent to a psychiatric examination and that the applicant had objected to such
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-189596
3 janvier 2019
3 janvier 2019
insisted that the removal of billboards had been arranged by the municipal authorities, that those facts had been confirmed by the law ‑ enforcement authorities, and that such measures had been contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202691
20 mars 2020
20 mars 2020
ongoing, have the applicants exhausted all effective domestic remedies, as required by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention, in relation to their complaint that they have been exposed to treatment contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-186982
17 septembre 2018
17 septembre 2018
In view of all the circumstances, can the applicants’ assertions in relation to any treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention they were exposed to in connection with the operation
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-211905
25 août 2021
25 août 2021
Has there been a violation of the applicant organisation’s right to freedom of expression, in particular its right to receive information, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention (see, mutatis
Source officiellePage 25 sur 1005
CONERARDY, Pierre, Alain, Claude
Jugement de clôture pour insuffisance d'actif — Jugement de clôture pour insuffisance d'actif ; mandataire liquidateur : Maître GANGLOFF (Christine), 36, rue des Jardins, 57050 Le Ban-Saint-Martin
23/02/2012
Voir →
CONERARDY, Pierre, Alain
Dépôt de l'état des créances Loi de 1985 — Avis de dépôt de l'état des créances, dépôt de l'état des créances au Tribunal de Grande Instance de Metz où les réclamations seront recevables dans un délai de quinze jours à compter de la présente publication
04/08/2008
Voir →
CONERARDY, Pierre, Alain, Claude
Jugement d'ouverture de liquidation judiciaire — Jugement prononçant la liquidation judiciaire ; insolvabilité notoire fixée au 24 octobre 2005 ; mandataire judiciaire à la liquidation : La SELARL ETUDE GANGLOFF & NARDI prise en la personne de Maître GANGLOFF (Christine), 36 rue des Jardins 57050 Le Ban-Saint-Martin
22/05/2008
Voir →