CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 5 juillet 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 5 July 2019   SECOND SECTION Application no. 23847/19 Evgheni TROCIN against the Republic of Moldova lodged on 12 April 2019 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged ill-treatment of the applicant while in detention. The applicant was diagnosed with multiple bruises on his body. His complaint against the police officers who had allegedly ill-treated him was dismissed after being examined for more than four years. The applicant complains that he has been subjected to ill-treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention and that the authorities have failed to conduct an effective investigation into those allegations. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES 1.     Was the applicant subjected to ill-treatment in breach of Article   3 of the Convention ( Corsacov v. Moldova , no. 18944/02, 4 April 2006)?   2.     Having regard to the procedural obligation under Article 3 of the Convention (see Labita v.   Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV), was the investigation conducted in the present case by the domestic authorities in breach of the aforementioned provision?