de la protection ; GREFFIER : Sophie MARAINE DEMANDEUR Monsieur [V] [T], demeurant : [Adresse 6] (réf dette condamnation [N] [M]) - [Localité 2], Comparant en personne, Assisté de Maître Bertrand LEBAILLY

cette qualité [Adresse 2] [Adresse 2] Représentant : Me Anne-Llaure DUMEAU, Postulant, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 628 Représentant : Me Odile FOUGERAY de la SCP FOUGERAY LE ROY LEBAILLY

In a further series of decisions the Supreme Court considered that it would be unfair for the legally-aided party to be penalised for the fact that legal ‑ aid applications could not be processed

It requested that the pipeline be ordered placed outside the boundaries of Franssila 1:59 because the compulsory acquisition permit had allegedly not been legally served on the applicant estate.

In a further series of decisions the Supreme Court considered that it would be unfair for the legally-aided party to be penalised for the fact that legal ‑ aid applications could not be processed

The applicant complained, in particular, that he had not been legally represented during the initial stage of the pre-trial investigation. 4.

The applicants had been and were legally aided throughout the litigation to appeal stage.

In contrast, second-parent adoption in a same-sex couple was not legally possible.

    By virtue of being struck out of the Court Register, the applicant company ceased legally to exist. No legal successor is known to exist. COMPLAINTS 17.

  10), and that he could not answer the question “In your opinion, to whom Crimea legitimately (legally) belongs? Mark your answer: 1) Ukraine; 2) Russian Federation” (question no.   11).

SAMMOC copie exécutoire le 01 avril 2025 à Me Breger Me Leraille COUR D'APPEL D'AMIENS CHAMBRE ÉCONOMIQUE ARRET DU 01 AVRIL 2025 N° RG 23/02693

The decision did not, however, indicate which confidential information it was based on, as this was classified “restricted” and could not therefore legally be disclosed to the applicant.

The issue in the present case was whether, notwithstanding that past approach, the specific measure called for by the applicant – a legally binding pre-notification rule – had been required in order to

application des dispositions des articles 804 et 805 du code de procédure civile, l'affaire a été débattue le 12 Novembre 2020, en audience publique, les avocats ne s'y étant pas opposés, devant Mme Solange LEBAILE

application des dispositions des articles 804 et 805 du code de procédure civile, l'affaire a été débattue le 26 Novembre 2020, en audience publique, les avocats ne s'y étant pas opposés, devant Mme Solange LEBAILE

Legal restrictions on change of name may be justified in public interest - little common ground between domestic systems as to conditions on which change of name may be legally effected - may therefore

As the applicant’s point of view had been clearly and unambiguously submitted in writing, an oral hearing was neither legally prescribed nor necessary in order to safeguard the applicant’s right to a fair

Ciftci's residence prohibition was lifted as from 5 March 1998, and that the applicant now lives legally in Austria.

  Recalling that the Luxembourg Government considered that Article 1 of 1 September 1998 on the civil responsibilities of the state and of public authorities offered an effective remedy, both legally