declare, which did not hinder the free movement of capital, had to be fulfilled by any individual, whether or not resident in France, and that the relevant provisions of the Customs Code were not contrary

    Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their private life, home or correspondence, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, on account of the search and seizure

being exposed to a risk of treatment contrary to Article 3.

It follows that the applicant's deportation was not “in accordance with law” and as such contrary to the requirements of Article   8.

for prolongation was lodged only three days prior to the expiry of the applicant’s pre-trial detention and the investigating judge upheld it, the applicant contends that the ensuing detention was contrary

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression contrary to Article   10 of the Convention (see Axel Springer AG v.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a breach of the principle of equality of arms and/or a violation of the applicant’s right of access to a court, contrary to Article 6 §   1 of the Convention

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private and family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s freedom of religion, contrary to Article   9 of the Convention?

He also alleges that his detention was contrary to Article 5 of the Convention because the court judgments ordering and extending it were not sufficiently reasoned and did not rely on relevant and sufficient

the EAU formed the basis of a statement in a Government press release on tackling extremism in universities that, “Events included the hosting of 6 speakers that are on record as expressing views contrary

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination on the ground of her brother’s political views, contrary to Article 14 read in conjunction with Article 8 of the Convention?

    Have the applicants suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of their Convention rights on the ground of their national origin, contrary to Article   14 of the Convention, read in conjunction

the restrictions imposed by the State in the present case, purportedly pursuant to Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention, applied for a purpose other than those envisaged by that provision, contrary

applicant’s constitutional complaint due to the allegedly unforeseeable application of the new four-month time-limit, depriving the applicant of the right of access to the Constitutional Court, both contrary

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a failure to protect the applicant’s right to respect for her private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, in particular his right to impart information and ideas, contrary to Article   10 of the Convention

    Has there been a violation of the applicants’ rights to respect for their family life, contrary to Article 8 § 1 of the Convention?