Y... a obtenu, le 1er novembre 1991, de la High Court of Justice de Londres, à l'encontre de M.

Article 111-17 The procedure for review in cassation of the resolutions [and rulings] of the Higher Commercial Court of Ukraine “...The resolution [or ruling] of the Higher Commercial Court of Ukraine

    As regards sentencing, the High Court's judgment included the following reasons:     “The High Court has concluded that the time elapsed - approximately 10 years before a final

The High Court then examined the CJEU judgment in Kotnik . 23 .

The second applicant appealed to the High Court. 3.     The first and second applicants’ appeals to the High Court 29 .

Sullivan & Ors [2007] IEHC 8) (“the first High Court judgment”).

On 2 November 2011 the High Court of Justice ruled against the Administration.

Thus, the High Court had carried out an extensive assessment of the applicant’s recent development and situation at that time.

VICTORIA , DEMEURANT A PREUTIN-HIGNY MEURTHE-ET-MOSELLE , LADITE REQUETE ENREGISTREE AU SECRETARIAT DU CONTENTIEUX DU CONSEIL D'ETAT LE 21 JUILLET 1977 ET TENDANT A CE QU'IL PLAISE AU CONSEIL ANNULER

COUR DE CASSATION Première présidence __________ OReins Pourvoi n° : Q 23-15.906 Demandeur : la société Conforama France Défendeur : la société High Point Real Estate LLC Requête n° : 704/24

Appellate proceedings The applicant appealed against the above judgment to Gulating High Court.

In 2015 that decision was reversed by the High Court and the applicant was subsequently refused leave to appeal.

Déboutées de leur demande de sursis, elles saisirent la High Court d’un recours contre cette décision mais n’obtinrent pas gain de cause.

.) - 56658/22 Decision 28.1.2025 [Section IV] Article 35 Article 35-1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Effective domestic remedy Four-month period (former six-month) Remedy before High Court of Cassation

Les défenderesses ayant soulevé, par conclusions du 16 mars 2012 une exception de litispendance au profit de la High Court de Londres saisie antérieurement du litige les opposant à la société Slocom Trading

That interpretation was in keeping with a decision of 19 January 2000 of the High Court of Cassation and Justice.

Procédure ultérieure devant la High Court concernant les visites et l’adoption 1. Phase préliminaire 17.

    On 22 May 2003 the High Court passed judgment in the criminal trial.

    The Council requested a stay on the order of the High Court and this application was adjourned until 20 December 1996, when the High Court judge ordered that execution on foot of the order