Oleksandrivna SATANOVSKA and Oleksandr Georgiy Petrovych RODZHERS against Ukraine lodged on 27 February 2019 STATEMENT OF FACTS The first applicant, Ms Satanovska Mariya Oleksandrivna, is a Ukrainian

As the applicant protested, A.A. threatened her that her relatives would have problems, if she did not confess, and hit her with his fists on the head, the face and the chest on many occasions.

appended table, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicants; Having regard to the fact that the Romanian Government did

The applicant disagreed, arguing that the alleged violation did not stem from the appeal judgment itself, but from the decision dismissing her request for annulment.

The law did not provide for proceedings which might prove that the improvement to a road did not confer any benefit and thus to rebut the presumption (judgment No. 14/1991).

Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mrs Marina Kimovna Veselovskaya, is a Russian national who was born in 1962 and lives in the town of Vilyuchinsk in the Kamchatka Region

applicant”), Mr Zlatko Jovanovski (“the fifth applicant”), Mr Dobre Tajkovski (“the sixth applicant”), Mr Dimce Trajkovski (“the seventh applicant”), Mr Dragan Trajkovski (“the eighth applicant”), Ms Marija

        Application No. 22080/93                       by Marina

  Maria Therese is now living in a family home.

The provision did not specify the amount of indemnity or the applicable conditions, and the courts could not substitute the legislature in this respect. 10.

} .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION PILOT-JUDGMENT PROCEDURE Application no. 1840/08 by Stefania BACH and Maria

  11208/02) out of the Court’s list of cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Ms Maria Paszkowska-Poślad, is a Polish national who was born in 1936 and lives in Środa

    Did the acts or omissions imputed to the applicants constitute a criminal offence under national law at the time when they were found to have been committed, as envisaged by Article  

:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s22FA5D7A { height:23.75pt } Published on 15 September 2025   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 6815/24 Mafalda Sofia DE CARVALHO GAMEIRO CEPA and José   Maria

    The applicant, Ms Maria Gryglak, is a Polish national, who was born in 1958 and lives in Mielec. 2.

If yes, did such accumulated legal responses represent an excessive burden for each applicant and entail, in substance or in effect, double jeopardy to his or her detriment (ibid.)?

Z... ni Maria A...

If so, did the interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicants?   3.

    On 23 July 2013, the Court invited these parties to submit updated observations, which they did. THE LAW 8.

{ margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } Published on 15 December 2025   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 51302/20 Mariya