Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-184201
29 mai 2018
29 mai 2018
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s freedom to leave the territory of the respondent State, contrary to Article 2 of Protocol No. 4, in so far as the measure adopted by
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-195099
9 juillet 2019
9 juillet 2019
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-189572
3 janvier 2019
3 janvier 2019
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s freedom to leave the territory of the respondent State, contrary to Article 2 of Protocol No. 4?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-199354
20 novembre 2019
20 novembre 2019
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention (see Paraskevopoulos v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-212097
10 septembre 2021
10 septembre 2021
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his correspondence with his lawyer, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see, for instance,
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242585
5 mars 2025
5 mars 2025
The applicants complain that their constitutional complaints were declared inadmissible as being lodged outside the four-month time-limit, contrary to the guarantees under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-200952
16 janvier 2020
16 janvier 2020
Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their private and family life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-186692
5 septembre 2018
5 septembre 2018
demolish the church, the only place of worship in the region which had already been used for some time, amount to discrimination against the applicants in the enjoyment of their Convention rights, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-214172
17 novembre 2021
17 novembre 2021
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention (see Janowski v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-162386
29 mars 2016
29 mars 2016
COMPLAINT The applicant complains that the domestic authorities established his tax liability contrary to the relevant domestic law, and that no effective procedure to challenge that decision was available
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207988
21 janvier 2021
21 janvier 2021
Has there been a violation of the applicant organisation’s freedom of religion, contrary to Article 9 of the Convention, taken alone or in conjunction with Article 11 of the Convention (see
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-237359
9 septembre 2024
9 septembre 2024
courts decided on the custody of her child and limited her parental rights on the basis of her sexual orientation, has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her Convention rights, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231571
12 février 2024
12 février 2024
If so, were the restrictions imposed by the State on the applicant, purportedly permitted under Article 6 of the Convention, applied for a purpose other than those envisaged by that provision, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6849
10 juillet 1998
10 juillet 1998
Moreover, contrary to Government’s submission, section 42(1) of 1976 Act does not define in limine scope of substantive right – the issue as to whether act was done for purposes of national security or
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-219372
31 août 2022
31 août 2022
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private and family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see Johansson v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187660
19 octobre 2018
19 octobre 2018
The applicants complain that their arrest and detention was unlawful and contrary to Article 5 of the Convention; that the decision to extradite them to Turkey did not comply with the procedural requirements
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2295
31 janvier 2008
31 janvier 2008
They later decided that the legal-assistance agreement between the applicant and his lawyer was contrary to domestic legislation and requested the Bar Association to take appropriate measures against the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248423
7 janvier 2026
7 janvier 2026
Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their private and family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4577
27 novembre 2003
27 novembre 2003
The Court considers that detention in the transit area for an indeterminate and unforeseeable period without legal basis or a valid court decision is in itself contrary to the principle of legal certainty
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-209807
8 avril 2021
8 avril 2021
Have the NABU publications breached the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention? 5.
Source officiellePage 20 sur 1005