CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 29 mai 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase }   Communicated on 29 May 2018   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 61709/13 Marcel SAVANIU against Romania lodged on 26 September 2013 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the interdiction on leaving country imposed on the applicant by decision no. 321/R adopted by the Piteşti Court of Appeal on 8 May 2009. The applicant was under criminal investigations for alleged acts of corruption at that time. The interdiction remained in place until 4   February 2015 when the Ploieşti Court of Appeal adopted the final decision in the case, acquitting the applicant. The applicant relies on Article 6 §§ 1 and 2 and Article 17 of the Convention, and on Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s freedom to leave the territory of the respondent State, contrary to Article 2 of Protocol No. 4, in so far as the measure adopted by the Piteşti Court of Appeal on 8   May   2009 is concerned?